
Core i5-10400F

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-10400F
2020Why buy it
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Costs $149 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $309 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 24.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 65.5 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $309 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (8,191 vs 12,814).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +22.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 8, while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 65.5 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($309 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G better than Core i5-10400F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.


Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
The Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 20,227 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G — a 2.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G uses Renoir (2020−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G's 20,227 — a 43.3% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 8,191 vs 12,814 (44% advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,454 vs 1,627, a 11.2% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 5,783 vs 7,556 (26.6% advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 8 MB on the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz | 4.4 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz | 3.6 GHz+24% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total)+50% | 8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512 kB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Renoir (2020−2023) |
| PassMark | 13,029 | 20,227+55% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 8,191 | 12,814+56% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,454 | 1,627+12% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,783 | 7,556+31% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G — the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and Socket AM4 (Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G).
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-3200+20% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G). The Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 8), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon Vega 8 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-10400F was priced at $160, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G came in at $309. On launch pricing ($160 vs $309), Core i5-10400F was $149 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 65.5 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G — making the Core i5-10400F the 21.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $160-48% | $309 |
| Performance per Dollar | 81.4+24% | 65.5 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













