PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 16,666).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.

Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.1% higher average FPS across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U

2022

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.1% higher average FPS across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 16,666).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.

Trade-offs

❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U better than Core i5-10400F?

Yes. Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 14.1% average FPS lead across 6 shared CPU game tests in our data, 27.9% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 14.1% more average FPS across 6 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U is the better fit. You are getting 27.9% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-10400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $160 MSRP, and it gives you a 14.1% average FPS lead across 6 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-10400F is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (81.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2020), 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-10400F Benchmark Check

Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
1080p
low	192 FPS	174 FPS
medium	152 FPS	151 FPS
high	123 FPS	122 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	103 FPS
1440p
low	153 FPS	148 FPS
medium	119 FPS	126 FPS
high	97 FPS	101 FPS
ultra	79 FPS	85 FPS
4K
low	82 FPS	83 FPS
medium	70 FPS	76 FPS
high	55 FPS	61 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	47 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
1080p
low	326 FPS	250 FPS
medium	318 FPS	211 FPS
high	290 FPS	185 FPS
ultra	253 FPS	164 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	215 FPS
medium	292 FPS	188 FPS
high	267 FPS	168 FPS
ultra	234 FPS	144 FPS
4K
low	309 FPS	148 FPS
medium	258 FPS	133 FPS
high	235 FPS	127 FPS
ultra	199 FPS	110 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
1080p
low	326 FPS	417 FPS
medium	326 FPS	417 FPS
high	326 FPS	417 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	417 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	417 FPS
medium	326 FPS	417 FPS
high	326 FPS	411 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	346 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	396 FPS
medium	326 FPS	338 FPS
high	289 FPS	295 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	235 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
1080p
low	326 FPS	417 FPS
medium	326 FPS	417 FPS
high	326 FPS	417 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	417 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	417 FPS
medium	326 FPS	417 FPS
high	326 FPS	417 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	417 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	417 FPS
medium	326 FPS	417 FPS
high	326 FPS	381 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	329 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U

The Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Cezanne U (Zen 3) (2021−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 16,666 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U — a 4.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U uses Cezanne U (Zen 3) (2021−2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U's 16,666 — a 24.5% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz	4.5 GHz+5%
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+45%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	16 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512K (per core)+100%
Process	14 nm	7 nm-50%
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Cezanne U (Zen 3) (2021−2022)
PassMark	13,029	16,666+28%
Cinebench R23 Multi	8,191	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,454	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,783	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U uses FP6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
Socket	LGA1200	FP6
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) / not specified (Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.