
Core i5-10400F
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-10400F
2020Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 20,084).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌1525% higher power demand at 65W vs 4W.
Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +45.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Draws 4W instead of 65W, a 61W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Core i5-10400F
2020Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
2022Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +45.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Draws 4W instead of 65W, a 61W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 20,084).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌1525% higher power demand at 65W vs 4W.
Trade-offs
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z better than Core i5-10400F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 274 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 244 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 231 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 185 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 161 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 88 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 461 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 377 FPS |
| high | 290 FPS | 323 FPS |
| ultra | 253 FPS | 286 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 397 FPS |
| medium | 292 FPS | 339 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 295 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 252 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 309 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 258 FPS | 241 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 224 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 195 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 502 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 502 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 502 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 502 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 502 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 502 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 502 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 433 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 502 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 440 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 389 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 321 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 502 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 502 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 502 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 502 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 502 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 502 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 502 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 502 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 502 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 502 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 482 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 418 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z

Core i5-10400F
Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.


Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
The Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt U (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.75 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB + 16 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 20,084 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 4.75 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z — a 9.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z uses Rembrandt U (Zen 3+) (2022) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z's 20,084 — a 42.6% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz | 4.75 GHz+10% |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz+7% | 2.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 16 MB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 4 MB+1500% |
| Process | 14 nm | 6 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Rembrandt U (Zen 3+) (2022) |
| PassMark | 13,029 | 20,084+54% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 8,191 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,454 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,783 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) / not specified (Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











