PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 26,864).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.

Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +65.5% higher average FPS across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS

2024

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +65.5% higher average FPS across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 26,864).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.

Trade-offs

❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS better than Core i5-10400F?

Yes. Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 65.5% average FPS lead across 7 shared CPU game tests in our data, 106.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 65.5% more average FPS across 7 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS is the better fit. You are getting 106.2% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-10400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $160 MSRP, and it gives you a 65.5% average FPS lead across 7 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-10400F is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (81.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2020), a healthier platform with FP7 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 6/12. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-10400F Benchmark Check

Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS
1080p
low	192 FPS	255 FPS
medium	152 FPS	235 FPS
high	123 FPS	198 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	170 FPS
1440p
low	153 FPS	227 FPS
medium	119 FPS	189 FPS
high	97 FPS	154 FPS
ultra	79 FPS	136 FPS
4K
low	82 FPS	157 FPS
medium	70 FPS	133 FPS
high	55 FPS	103 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	91 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS
1080p
low	326 FPS	469 FPS
medium	318 FPS	388 FPS
high	290 FPS	336 FPS
ultra	253 FPS	301 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	410 FPS
medium	292 FPS	358 FPS
high	267 FPS	310 FPS
ultra	234 FPS	265 FPS
4K
low	309 FPS	270 FPS
medium	258 FPS	247 FPS
high	235 FPS	234 FPS
ultra	199 FPS	202 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS
1080p
low	326 FPS	672 FPS
medium	326 FPS	672 FPS
high	326 FPS	672 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	594 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	672 FPS
medium	326 FPS	622 FPS
high	326 FPS	525 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	451 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	521 FPS
medium	326 FPS	458 FPS
high	289 FPS	406 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	345 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS
1080p
low	326 FPS	672 FPS
medium	326 FPS	672 FPS
high	326 FPS	672 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	672 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	672 FPS
medium	326 FPS	672 FPS
high	326 FPS	633 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	548 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	559 FPS
medium	326 FPS	501 FPS
high	326 FPS	446 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	384 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS

The Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 26,864 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS — a 17% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS uses Hawk Point (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS's 26,864 — a 69.4% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz	5.1 GHz+19%
Base Clock	2.9 GHz	3.3 GHz+14%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	16 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	1 MB (per core)+300%
Process	14 nm	4 nm-71%
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Hawk Point (2024−2025)
PassMark	13,029	26,864+106%
Cinebench R23 Multi	8,191	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,454	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,783	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS
Socket	LGA1200	FP7
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) / not specified (Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.