Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen 9 4900H

Intel

Core i5-10400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2020

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 9 4900H

8 Cores16 Thrd45 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2020

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

  • +50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 9 4900H.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 4900H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 18,887).
  • Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 4900H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.

Ryzen 9 4900H

2020

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +27.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 9 4900H better than Core i5-10400F?
Yes. Ryzen 9 4900H is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 27.6% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 45% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 9 4900H is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 27.6% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 9 4900H is the better fit. You are getting 45% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 9 4900H is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-10400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen 9 4900H is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $160 MSRP, and it gives you a 27.6% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-10400F is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (81.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 9 4900H is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i5-10400FRyzen 9 4900H
1080p
low192 FPS178 FPS
medium152 FPS145 FPS
high123 FPS115 FPS
ultra100 FPS94 FPS
1440p
low153 FPS153 FPS
medium119 FPS123 FPS
high97 FPS98 FPS
ultra79 FPS80 FPS
4K
low82 FPS85 FPS
medium70 FPS74 FPS
high55 FPS58 FPS
ultra43 FPS45 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i5-10400FRyzen 9 4900H
1080p
low326 FPS393 FPS
medium318 FPS318 FPS
high290 FPS282 FPS
ultra253 FPS244 FPS
1440p
low326 FPS338 FPS
medium292 FPS284 FPS
high267 FPS256 FPS
ultra234 FPS215 FPS
4K
low309 FPS271 FPS
medium258 FPS236 FPS
high235 FPS215 FPS
ultra199 FPS185 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i5-10400FRyzen 9 4900H
1080p
low326 FPS472 FPS
medium326 FPS472 FPS
high326 FPS472 FPS
ultra326 FPS472 FPS
1440p
low326 FPS472 FPS
medium326 FPS472 FPS
high326 FPS472 FPS
ultra326 FPS427 FPS
4K
low326 FPS462 FPS
medium326 FPS395 FPS
high289 FPS346 FPS
ultra229 FPS282 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i5-10400FRyzen 9 4900H
1080p
low326 FPS472 FPS
medium326 FPS472 FPS
high326 FPS472 FPS
ultra326 FPS472 FPS
1440p
low326 FPS472 FPS
medium326 FPS472 FPS
high326 FPS472 FPS
ultra326 FPS455 FPS
4K
low326 FPS472 FPS
medium326 FPS442 FPS
high326 FPS382 FPS
ultra326 FPS327 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Ryzen 9 4900H

Intel

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

AMD

Ryzen 9 4900H

The Ryzen 9 4900H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 March 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir-H (Zen 2) (2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 18,887 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 9 4900H offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 9 4900H has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 9 4900H — a 2.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 4900H (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 9 4900H uses Renoir-H (Zen 2) (2020) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Ryzen 9 4900H's 18,887 — a 36.7% lead for the Ryzen 9 4900H. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 4900H.

FeatureCore i5-10400FRyzen 9 4900H
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock
4.3 GHz
4.4 GHz+2%
Base Clock
2.9 GHz
3.3 GHz+14%
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)+50%
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
512 kB (per core)+100%
Process
14 nm
7 nm-50%
Architecture
Comet Lake (2020−2025)
Renoir-H (Zen 2) (2020)
PassMark
13,029
18,887+45%
Cinebench R23 Multi
8,191
Geekbench 6 Single
1,454
Geekbench 6 Multi
5,783
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 9 4900H uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-10400FRyzen 9 4900H
Socket
LGA1200
FP6
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) / not specified (Ryzen 9 4900H). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.

FeatureCore i5-10400FRyzen 9 4900H
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Gaming