
Core i5-10400F
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-10400F
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $589 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $749 MSRP).
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 9 9955HX3D.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 9955HX3D across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 61,578).
- ❌18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 9955HX3D moves to FL1 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 9955HX3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +81.6% higher average FPS across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FL1 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
- ✅75% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon 610M, while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌368.1% HIGHER MSRP$749 MSRPvs$160 MSRP
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Core i5-10400F
2020Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $589 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $749 MSRP).
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 9 9955HX3D.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +81.6% higher average FPS across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FL1 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
- ✅75% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon 610M, while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 9955HX3D across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 61,578).
- ❌18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 9955HX3D moves to FL1 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 9955HX3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌368.1% HIGHER MSRP$749 MSRPvs$160 MSRP
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 9955HX3D better than Core i5-10400F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 9 9955HX3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 287 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 217 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 183 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 264 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 170 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 150 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 153 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 103 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 9 9955HX3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 698 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 601 FPS |
| high | 290 FPS | 448 FPS |
| ultra | 253 FPS | 376 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 579 FPS |
| medium | 292 FPS | 517 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 398 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 311 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 309 FPS | 325 FPS |
| medium | 258 FPS | 294 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 218 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 9 9955HX3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 851 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 696 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 627 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 539 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 680 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 557 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 490 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 416 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 401 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 361 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 302 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 9 9955HX3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 1080 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 976 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 854 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 768 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 853 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 753 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 660 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 571 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 622 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 557 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 494 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 426 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Ryzen 9 9955HX3D

Core i5-10400F
Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.


Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
The Ryzen 9 9955HX3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Fire Range-HX (Zen 5) (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FL1. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 61,578 points. Launch price was $700.
Processing Power
The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D — a 22.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D uses Fire Range-HX (Zen 5) (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D's 61,578 — a 130.1% lead for the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 9 9955HX3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 16 / 32+167% |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz | 5.4 GHz+26% |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz+16% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 128 MB (total)+967% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 14 nm | 4 nm-71% |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Fire Range-HX (Zen 5) (2025) |
| PassMark | 13,029 | 61,578+373% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 8,191 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,454 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,783 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D uses FL1 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F versus 5600 on the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D — the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-10400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 96 — 28.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-10400F) vs 28 (Ryzen 9 9955HX3D) — the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and FL1 (Ryzen 9 9955HX3D).
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 9 9955HX3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | FL1 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | 5600+139900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+139810033% | 96 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 28+75% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen 9 9955HX3D). The Ryzen 9 9955HX3D includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon 610M), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600; Ryzen 9 9955HX3D rivals Core Ultra 9 185H.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 9 9955HX3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | AMD Radeon 610M |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-10400F launched at $160 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D debuted at $749. On MSRP ($160 vs $749), the Core i5-10400F is $589 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 82.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D — making the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D the 1% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 9 9955HX3D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $160-79% | $749 |
| Performance per Dollar | 81.4 | 82.2 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











