
Core i5-10400F

Ryzen 9 PRO 7945
Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen 9 PRO 7945: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-10400F
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $249 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (8,191 vs 28,905).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 81.4 vs 114.5 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Ryzen 9 PRO 7945
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +60.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+433.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Delivers 40.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.5 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
- ✅75% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌155.6% HIGHER MSRP$409 MSRPvs$160 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 better than Core i5-10400F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.


Ryzen 9 PRO 7945
The Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 46,828 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 — a 22.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 uses Raphael (2023−2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945's 46,828 — a 112.9% lead for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 8,191 vs 28,905 (111.7% advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,454 vs 2,206, a 41.1% lead for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 5,783 vs 16,832 (97.7% advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 12 / 24+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz | 5.4 GHz+26% |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz | 3.7 GHz+28% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 64 MB (total)+433% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core)+25500% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 5 nm-64% |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Raphael (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 13,029 | 46,828+259% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 8,191 | 28,905+253% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,454 | 2,206+52% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,783 | 16,832+191% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F versus DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 — the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 supports 95% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-10400F) vs 28 (Ryzen 9 PRO 7945) — the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and AMD X670E,AMD X670,AMD B650E,AMD B650,AMD A620 (Ryzen 9 PRO 7945).
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | DDR5-5200+95% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 28+75% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) vs true (Ryzen 9 PRO 7945). The Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600; Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 rivals Core i9-13900.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon Graphics |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | true |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-10400F was priced at $160, while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 came in at $409. On launch pricing ($160 vs $409), Core i5-10400F was $249 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 114.5 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 — making the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 the 33.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $160-61% | $409 |
| Performance per Dollar | 81.4 | 114.5+41% |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













