PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 19,469).
❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 moves to FP8 and DDR5.

Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +40.3% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340

2025

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +40.3% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 19,469).
❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 moves to FP8 and DDR5.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 better than Core i5-10400F?

Yes. Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 40.3% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data, 49.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 40.3% more average FPS across 3 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 is the better fit. You are getting 49.4% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-10400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $160 MSRP, and it gives you a 40.3% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-10400F is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (81.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2020), a healthier platform with FP8 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 6/12. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-10400F Benchmark Check

Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340
1080p
low	192 FPS	245 FPS
medium	152 FPS	227 FPS
high	123 FPS	192 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	165 FPS
1440p
low	153 FPS	215 FPS
medium	119 FPS	181 FPS
high	97 FPS	149 FPS
ultra	79 FPS	131 FPS
4K
low	82 FPS	149 FPS
medium	70 FPS	126 FPS
high	55 FPS	98 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	85 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340
1080p
low	326 FPS	173 FPS
medium	318 FPS	146 FPS
high	290 FPS	132 FPS
ultra	253 FPS	116 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	146 FPS
medium	292 FPS	126 FPS
high	267 FPS	117 FPS
ultra	234 FPS	101 FPS
4K
low	309 FPS	121 FPS
medium	258 FPS	107 FPS
high	235 FPS	99 FPS
ultra	199 FPS	83 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340
1080p
low	326 FPS	487 FPS
medium	326 FPS	487 FPS
high	326 FPS	487 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	403 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	487 FPS
medium	326 FPS	483 FPS
high	326 FPS	418 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	340 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	399 FPS
medium	326 FPS	337 FPS
high	289 FPS	290 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	230 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340
1080p
low	326 FPS	487 FPS
medium	326 FPS	487 FPS
high	326 FPS	487 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	487 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	487 FPS
medium	326 FPS	487 FPS
high	326 FPS	487 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	487 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	487 FPS
medium	326 FPS	473 FPS
high	326 FPS	419 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	363 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340

The Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Krackan Point (2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,469 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-10400F and Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 — a 11% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 uses Krackan Point (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340's 19,469 — a 39.6% lead for the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 8 MB on the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	6 / 12
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz	4.8 GHz+12%
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+45%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)+50%	8 MB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	1 MB (per core)+300%
Process	14 nm	4 nm-71%
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Krackan Point (2025)
PassMark	13,029	19,469+49%
Cinebench R23 Multi	8,191	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,454	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,783	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340
Socket	LGA1200	FP8
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) / not specified (Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340
Integrated GPU	No	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-10400F launched at $160 MSRP, while the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 debuted at $0. On MSRP ($160 vs $0), the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 is $160 cheaper.