PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $240 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen AI 9 365.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen AI 9 365 across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 30,187).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 24 MB).
❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI 9 365 moves to FP8 and DDR5.

Ryzen AI 9 365

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +41.1% higher average FPS across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌
150% HIGHER MSRP
$400 MSRPvs$160 MSRP
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Ryzen AI 9 365

2024

Why buy it

✅Costs $240 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen AI 9 365.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +41.1% higher average FPS across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen AI 9 365 across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 30,187).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 24 MB).
❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI 9 365 moves to FP8 and DDR5.

Trade-offs

❌
150% HIGHER MSRP
$400 MSRPvs$160 MSRP
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen AI 9 365 better than Core i5-10400F?

Yes. Ryzen AI 9 365 is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 41.1% average FPS lead across 7 shared CPU game tests in our data, 131.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen AI 9 365 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 41.1% more average FPS across 7 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen AI 9 365 is the better fit. You are getting 131.7% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 20 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen AI 9 365 is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-10400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen AI 9 365 is 150.0% more expensive on MSRP at $400 MSRP versus $160 MSRP, and it gives you a 41.1% average FPS lead across 7 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-10400F is also 7.9% better value on MSRP (81.4 vs 75.5 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen AI 9 365 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2020), a healthier platform with FP8 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, 100% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 12 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 20 threads instead of 6/12. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-10400F Benchmark Check

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen AI 9 365
1080p
low	192 FPS	246 FPS
medium	152 FPS	231 FPS
high	123 FPS	194 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	166 FPS
1440p
low	153 FPS	216 FPS
medium	119 FPS	184 FPS
high	97 FPS	148 FPS
ultra	79 FPS	130 FPS
4K
low	82 FPS	150 FPS
medium	70 FPS	128 FPS
high	55 FPS	98 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	86 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Ryzen AI 9 365

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen AI 9 365
1080p
low	326 FPS	349 FPS
medium	318 FPS	297 FPS
high	290 FPS	253 FPS
ultra	253 FPS	229 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	302 FPS
medium	292 FPS	268 FPS
high	267 FPS	229 FPS
ultra	234 FPS	196 FPS
4K
low	309 FPS	180 FPS
medium	258 FPS	162 FPS
high	235 FPS	155 FPS
ultra	199 FPS	135 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Ryzen AI 9 365

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen AI 9 365
1080p
low	326 FPS	755 FPS
medium	326 FPS	598 FPS
high	326 FPS	525 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	441 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	677 FPS
medium	326 FPS	539 FPS
high	326 FPS	467 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	398 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	491 FPS
medium	326 FPS	408 FPS
high	289 FPS	363 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	303 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Ryzen AI 9 365

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen AI 9 365
1080p
low	326 FPS	755 FPS
medium	326 FPS	755 FPS
high	326 FPS	677 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	603 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	740 FPS
medium	326 FPS	660 FPS
high	326 FPS	568 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	496 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	519 FPS
medium	326 FPS	473 FPS
high	326 FPS	419 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	367 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Ryzen AI 9 365

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Ryzen AI 9 365

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Ryzen AI 9 365

The Ryzen AI 9 365 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Julho 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Strix Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 30,187 points. Launch price was $499.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen AI 9 365 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Ryzen AI 9 365 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI 9 365 — a 15.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI 9 365 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen AI 9 365 uses Strix Point (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Ryzen AI 9 365's 30,187 — a 79.4% lead for the Ryzen AI 9 365. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 24 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI 9 365.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen AI 9 365
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	10 / 20+67%
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz	5 GHz+16%
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+45%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	24 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	1 MB (per core)+300%
Process	14 nm	4 nm-71%
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Strix Point (2024−2025)
PassMark	13,029	30,187+132%
Cinebench R23 Multi	8,191	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,454	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,783	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen AI 9 365 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F versus DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen AI 9 365 — the Ryzen AI 9 365 supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-10400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-10400F) vs 20 (Ryzen AI 9 365) — the Ryzen AI 9 365 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen AI 9 365
Socket	LGA1200	FP8
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	DDR5-5600+25%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB+100%	64 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	20+25%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Ryzen AI 9 365 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) vs AMD-V (Ryzen AI 9 365). The Ryzen AI 9 365 includes integrated graphics (Radeon 880M), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming, Ryzen AI 9 365 targets Mobile AI. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen AI 9 365
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Radeon 880M
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	AMD-V
Target Use	Gaming	Mobile AI

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-10400F launched at $160 MSRP, while the Ryzen AI 9 365 debuted at $400. On MSRP ($160 vs $400), the Core i5-10400F is $240 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 75.5 pts/$ for the Ryzen AI 9 365 — making the Core i5-10400F the 7.6% better value option.