PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (8,191 vs 22,246).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +35.6% higher average FPS across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 890M, while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +35.6% higher average FPS across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 890M, while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (8,191 vs 22,246).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 better than Core i5-10400F?

Yes. Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 35.6% average FPS lead across 6 shared CPU game tests in our data, 171.6% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, 158.0% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 35.6% more average FPS across 6 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 is the better fit. You are getting 171.6% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 is the smarter buy by a wide margin for a fresh build. Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $160 MSRP, and it gives you a 35.6% average FPS lead across 6 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-10400F only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that is mostly used-market pricing on an obsolete 2020 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (81.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a very cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1200.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2020), a healthier platform with FP8 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 24 threads instead of 6/12. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-10400F Benchmark Check

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
1080p
low	192 FPS	245 FPS
medium	152 FPS	230 FPS
high	123 FPS	192 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	165 FPS
1440p
low	153 FPS	216 FPS
medium	119 FPS	184 FPS
high	97 FPS	148 FPS
ultra	79 FPS	130 FPS
4K
low	82 FPS	150 FPS
medium	70 FPS	128 FPS
high	55 FPS	98 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	86 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
1080p
low	326 FPS	261 FPS
medium	318 FPS	220 FPS
high	290 FPS	194 FPS
ultra	253 FPS	173 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	232 FPS
medium	292 FPS	203 FPS
high	267 FPS	178 FPS
ultra	234 FPS	151 FPS
4K
low	309 FPS	154 FPS
medium	258 FPS	140 FPS
high	235 FPS	135 FPS
ultra	199 FPS	115 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
1080p
low	326 FPS	738 FPS
medium	326 FPS	587 FPS
high	326 FPS	508 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	429 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	661 FPS
medium	326 FPS	533 FPS
high	326 FPS	455 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	388 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	482 FPS
medium	326 FPS	403 FPS
high	289 FPS	359 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	301 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
1080p
low	326 FPS	840 FPS
medium	326 FPS	809 FPS
high	326 FPS	694 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	625 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	757 FPS
medium	326 FPS	680 FPS
high	326 FPS	583 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	515 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	518 FPS
medium	326 FPS	473 FPS
high	326 FPS	420 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	369 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375

The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 33,619 points. Launch price was $499.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 — a 17% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 uses Strix Point (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375's 33,619 — a 88.3% lead for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 8,191 vs 22,246 (92.4% advantage for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,454 vs 2,864, a 65.3% lead for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 5,783 vs 15,012 (88.8% advantage for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 16 MB on the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	12 / 24+100%
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz	5.1 GHz+19%
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+45%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	16 MB+33%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	1 MB (per core)+300%
Process	14 nm	4 nm-71%
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Strix Point (2024−2025)
PassMark	13,029	33,619+158%
Cinebench R23 Multi	8,191	22,246+172%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,454	2,864+97%
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,783	15,012+160%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F versus LPDDR5x-8000 on the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 — the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and FP8,FP7 (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375).

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
Socket	LGA1200	FP8
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	LPDDR5x-8000+25%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	256 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) vs AMD-V, IOMMU (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375). The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 includes integrated graphics (Radeon 890M), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming, Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 targets Mobile Workstation / High-end Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600; Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 rivals Core i9-14900HX.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Radeon 890M
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	AMD-V, IOMMU
Target Use	Gaming	Mobile Workstation / High-end Gaming

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-10400F launched at $160 MSRP, while the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 debuted at $0. On MSRP ($160 vs $0), the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 is $160 cheaper.