Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen AI Max+ 395

CPU

GPU

Core i5-10400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2020

Core family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen AI Max+ 395

16 Cores32 Thrd55 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2025

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen AI Max+ 395 Performance Spectrum

Core i5-10400F

6 / 12

13,029

0.0%

55,025

+322.3%

Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS

Ryzen 7 7700X

Ryzen 7 8840HX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX

Ryzen 9 9950X3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen AI Max+ 395 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen AI Max+ 395: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen AI Max+ 395.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen AI Max+ 395 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 55,025).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Ryzen AI Max+ 395 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.

Ryzen AI Max+ 395

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +40.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+433.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP11 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon 8060S, while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen AI Max+ 395 better than Core i5-10400F?

Yes. Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 40.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 322.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 40.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is the stronger fit. You are getting 322.3% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 433.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Ryzen AI Max+ 395 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $160 MSRP, and it still gives you a 40.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-10400F only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2020 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (81.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1200.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen AI Max+ 395 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2020), a healthier platform with FP11 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, 433.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 12 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 6/12. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen AI Max+ 395 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Ryzen AI Max+ 395

The Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 55,025 points. Launch price was $450.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 — a 17% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 uses Strix Halo (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Ryzen AI Max+ 395's 55,025 — a 123.4% lead for the Ryzen AI Max+ 395. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI Max+ 395.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen AI Max+ 395
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	16 / 32+167%
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz	5.1 GHz+19%
Base Clock	2.9 GHz	3 GHz+3%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	64 MB (total)+433%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+25500%	1 MB (per core)
Process	14 nm	4 nm-71%
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Strix Halo (2025)
PassMark	13,029	55,025+322%
Cinebench R23 Multi	8,191	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,454	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,783	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 uses FP11 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F versus 8000 on the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 — the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 supports 200.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-10400F) vs 4 (Ryzen AI Max+ 395). Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and FP11 (Ryzen AI Max+ 395).

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen AI Max+ 395
Socket	LGA1200	FP11
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	8000+200%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen AI Max+ 395). The Ryzen AI Max+ 395 includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon 8060S), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600; Ryzen AI Max+ 395 rivals Core Ultra 9 285HX.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen AI Max+ 395
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	AMD Radeon 8060S
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-10400F was priced at $160, while the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 came in at $0. On launch pricing ($160 vs $0), Ryzen AI Max+ 395 was $160 cheaper.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen AI Max+ 395
MSRP	$160	$0-100%
Performance per Dollar	81.4	—
Release Date	2020	2025

Search Core i5-10400F on Amazon

Search Ryzen AI Max+ 395 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.