PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen Embedded V3C48.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Embedded V3C48 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 20,203).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Ryzen Embedded V3C48 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.

Ryzen Embedded V3C48

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +22.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Ryzen Embedded V3C48

2022

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen Embedded V3C48.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +22.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Embedded V3C48 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 20,203).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Ryzen Embedded V3C48 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.

Trade-offs

❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Embedded V3C48 better than Core i5-10400F?

Yes. Ryzen Embedded V3C48 is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 22.9% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 55.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen Embedded V3C48 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 22.9% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Embedded V3C48 is the better fit. You are getting 55.1% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Embedded V3C48 is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-10400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen Embedded V3C48 is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $160 MSRP, and it gives you a 22.9% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-10400F is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (81.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Embedded V3C48 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2020), a healthier platform with FP7 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 6/12. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-10400F Benchmark Check

Ryzen Embedded V3C48 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen Embedded V3C48
1080p
low	192 FPS	174 FPS
medium	152 FPS	139 FPS
high	123 FPS	113 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	90 FPS
1440p
low	153 FPS	144 FPS
medium	119 FPS	113 FPS
high	97 FPS	90 FPS
ultra	79 FPS	72 FPS
4K
low	82 FPS	66 FPS
medium	70 FPS	55 FPS
high	55 FPS	44 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	35 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Ryzen Embedded V3C48

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen Embedded V3C48
1080p
low	326 FPS	331 FPS
medium	318 FPS	281 FPS
high	290 FPS	240 FPS
ultra	253 FPS	196 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	286 FPS
medium	292 FPS	251 FPS
high	267 FPS	217 FPS
ultra	234 FPS	177 FPS
4K
low	309 FPS	206 FPS
medium	258 FPS	187 FPS
high	235 FPS	167 FPS
ultra	199 FPS	134 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Ryzen Embedded V3C48

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen Embedded V3C48
1080p
low	326 FPS	505 FPS
medium	326 FPS	505 FPS
high	326 FPS	505 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	444 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	505 FPS
medium	326 FPS	459 FPS
high	326 FPS	416 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	359 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	412 FPS
medium	326 FPS	320 FPS
high	289 FPS	283 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	227 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Ryzen Embedded V3C48

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen Embedded V3C48
1080p
low	326 FPS	505 FPS
medium	326 FPS	505 FPS
high	326 FPS	505 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	505 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	505 FPS
medium	326 FPS	505 FPS
high	326 FPS	505 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	461 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	486 FPS
medium	326 FPS	435 FPS
high	326 FPS	391 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	339 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Ryzen Embedded V3C48

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Ryzen Embedded V3C48

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Ryzen Embedded V3C48

The Ryzen Embedded V3C48 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt (2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,203 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen Embedded V3C48 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen Embedded V3C48 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V3C48 — a 12.3% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded V3C48 uses Rembrandt (2022) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Ryzen Embedded V3C48's 20,203 — a 43.2% lead for the Ryzen Embedded V3C48. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded V3C48.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen Embedded V3C48
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz+13%	3.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz	3.3 GHz+14%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	16 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512 kB (per core)+100%
Process	14 nm	6 nm-57%
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Rembrandt (2022)
PassMark	13,029	20,203+55%
Cinebench R23 Multi	8,191	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,454	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,783	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Embedded V3C48 uses FP7 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen Embedded V3C48
Socket	LGA1200	FP7
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) / not specified (Ryzen Embedded V3C48). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.