PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,339 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 105.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 39.7 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 350W, a 285W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen Threadripper 7970X.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 7970X across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (8,191 vs 75,000).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 7970X, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 92 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen Threadripper 7970X moves to sTR5 and DDR5.

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +100.1% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 92 PCIe lanes vs 16.
✅Newer platform on sTR5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
✅475% more PCIe lanes (92 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 39.7 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
❌438.5% higher power demand at 350W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,339 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 105.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 39.7 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 350W, a 285W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen Threadripper 7970X.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +100.1% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 92 PCIe lanes vs 16.
✅Newer platform on sTR5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
✅475% more PCIe lanes (92 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 7970X across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (8,191 vs 75,000).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 7970X, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 92 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen Threadripper 7970X moves to sTR5 and DDR5.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 39.7 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
❌438.5% higher power demand at 350W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper 7970X better than Core i5-10400F?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Ryzen Threadripper 7970X makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-10400F is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen Threadripper 7970X is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 100.1% more average FPS across 3 shared CPU game tests. It also has a big cache advantage at 128 MB vs 12 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper 7970X is the better fit. You are getting 815.6% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 966.7% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-10400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen Threadripper 7970X is 1461.9% more expensive on MSRP at $2,499 MSRP versus $160 MSRP, and it gives you a 100.1% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-10400F is also 105.2% better value on MSRP (81.4 vs 39.7 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2020), a healthier platform with sTR5 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, 3D V-Cache and a much larger 128 MB L3 cache instead of 12 MB, more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 6/12, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-10400F Benchmark Check

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen Threadripper 7970X
1080p
low	192 FPS	314 FPS
medium	152 FPS	289 FPS
high	123 FPS	240 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	203 FPS
1440p
low	153 FPS	278 FPS
medium	119 FPS	231 FPS
high	97 FPS	178 FPS
ultra	79 FPS	158 FPS
4K
low	82 FPS	191 FPS
medium	70 FPS	158 FPS
high	55 FPS	121 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	107 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen Threadripper 7970X
1080p
low	326 FPS	807 FPS
medium	318 FPS	688 FPS
high	290 FPS	535 FPS
ultra	253 FPS	467 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	666 FPS
medium	292 FPS	591 FPS
high	267 FPS	474 FPS
ultra	234 FPS	384 FPS
4K
low	309 FPS	372 FPS
medium	258 FPS	335 FPS
high	235 FPS	306 FPS
ultra	199 FPS	268 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen Threadripper 7970X
1080p
low	326 FPS	891 FPS
medium	326 FPS	723 FPS
high	326 FPS	649 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	552 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	714 FPS
medium	326 FPS	580 FPS
high	326 FPS	508 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	427 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	508 FPS
medium	326 FPS	419 FPS
high	289 FPS	375 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	311 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen Threadripper 7970X
1080p
low	326 FPS	1116 FPS
medium	326 FPS	1002 FPS
high	326 FPS	879 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	792 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	872 FPS
medium	326 FPS	768 FPS
high	326 FPS	674 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	587 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	636 FPS
medium	326 FPS	568 FPS
high	326 FPS	504 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	437 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

The Ryzen Threadripper 7970X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 October 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Storm Peak (2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 99,152 points. Launch price was $2,499.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 7970X offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 7970X has 26 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 7970X — a 20.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 7970X (base: 2.9 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 7970X uses Storm Peak (2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Ryzen Threadripper 7970X's 99,152 — a 153.5% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 7970X. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 8,191 vs 75,000 (160.6% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 7970X). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,454 vs 2,900, a 66.4% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 7970X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 5,783 vs 24,000 (122.3% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 7970X). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper 7970X.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen Threadripper 7970X
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	32 / 64+433%
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz	5.3 GHz+23%
Base Clock	2.9 GHz	4 GHz+38%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	128 MB (total)+967%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	1 MB (per core)+300%
Process	14 nm	5 nm-64%
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Storm Peak (2023)
PassMark	13,029	99,152+661%
Cinebench R23 Multi	8,191	75,000+816%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,454	2,900+99%
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,783	24,000+315%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 7970X uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F versus DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen Threadripper 7970X — the Ryzen Threadripper 7970X supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper 7970X supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-10400F) vs 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 7970X). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-10400F) vs 92 (Ryzen Threadripper 7970X) — the Ryzen Threadripper 7970X offers 76 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper 7970X).

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen Threadripper 7970X
Socket	LGA1200	sTR5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	DDR5-5200+25%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	1024 GB+700%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	92+475%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen Threadripper 7970X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen Threadripper 7970X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) vs AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper 7970X). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming, Ryzen Threadripper 7970X targets High-End Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600; Ryzen Threadripper 7970X rivals Xeon w7-2495X.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen Threadripper 7970X
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	AMD-V
Target Use	Gaming	High-End Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-10400F launched at $160 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper 7970X debuted at $2499. On MSRP ($160 vs $2499), the Core i5-10400F is $2339 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 39.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 7970X — making the Core i5-10400F the 69% better value option.