Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

CPU

GPU

Core i5-10400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2020

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

24 Cores48 Thrd280 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2022

Threadripper Pro family

···

Buy on Amazon

Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX Performance Spectrum

Core i5-10400F

6 / 12

13,029

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

24 / 48

66,614

+411.3%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,239 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).
✅Delivers 193.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 27.8 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 280W, a 215W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (8,191 vs 45,000).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +76.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 16.
✅700% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 27.8 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($2,399 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
❌330.8% higher power demand at 280W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX better than Core i5-10400F?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-10400F is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 76.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests. It also has a clear cache advantage at 128 MB versus 12 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is the stronger fit. You are getting 449.4% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 966.7% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-10400F is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX comes in 1399.4% more expensive on MSRP at $2,399 MSRP versus $160 MSRP, and it still gives you a 76.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-10400F is also 193.3% better value on MSRP (81.4 vs 27.8 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2020), 3D V-Cache and a much larger 128 MB L3 cache instead of 12 MB, and more multi-core headroom with 24 cores / 48 threads instead of 6/12. That extra cache should keep paying off in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-08. It is based on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 66,614 points. Launch price was $2,399.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX has 18 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX — a 4.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX uses Chagall PRO (2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX's 66,614 — a 134.6% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 8,191 vs 45,000 (138.4% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,454 vs 1,550, a 6.4% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 5,783 vs 15,500 (91.3% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	24 / 48+300%
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz	4.5 GHz+5%
Base Clock	2.9 GHz	3.8 GHz+31%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	128 MB+967%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512K (per core)+100%
Process	14 nm	7 nm-50%
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Chagall PRO (2022)
PassMark	13,029	66,614+411%
Cinebench R23 Multi	8,191	45,000+449%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,454	1,550+7%
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,783	15,500+168%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-10400F) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-10400F) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX offers 112 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX).

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
Socket	LGA1200	sWRX8
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	DDR4-3200+20%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	2048 GB+1500%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	128+700%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) vs AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX targets Professional Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX rivals Xeon Gold 6430.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	AMD-V
Target Use	Gaming	Professional Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-10400F was priced at $160, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX came in at $2399. On launch pricing ($160 vs $2399), Core i5-10400F was $2239 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 27.8 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX — making the Core i5-10400F the 98.3% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
MSRP	$160-93%	$2399
Performance per Dollar	81.4+193%	27.8
Release Date	2020	2022

Search Core i5-10400F on Amazon

Search Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.