Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

CPU

GPU

Core i5-10400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2020

Core family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

16 Cores32 Thrd350 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2025

Buy on Amazon

Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX Performance Spectrum

Core i5-10400F

6 / 12

13,029

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

16 / 32

67,561

+418.5%

Ryzen 7 9700X

Ryzen 9 7845HX

Ryzen 9 9850HX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $269 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 350W, a 285W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (8,191 vs 40,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 81.4 vs 157.5 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +58.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+433.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 16.
✅Delivers 93.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 157.5 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($429 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on sTR5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌
168.1% HIGHER MSRP
$429 MSRPvs$160 MSRP
❌438.5% higher power demand at 350W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX better than Core i5-10400F?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-10400F is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 58.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is the stronger fit. You are getting 388.3% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 433.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is the better buy right now. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX comes in 168.1% more expensive on MSRP at $429 MSRP versus $160 MSRP, and it still gives you a 58.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 93.4% better value on MSRP (157.5 vs 81.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2020), a healthier platform with sTR5 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, 433.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 12 MB), more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 6/12, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 67,561 points. Launch price was $1,649.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX — a 22.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX (base: 2.9 GHz vs 4.5 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX uses Shimada Peak (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX's 67,561 — a 135.3% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 8,191 vs 40,000 (132% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,454 vs 3,016, a 69.9% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 5,783 vs 23,596 (121.3% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	16 / 32+167%
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz	5.4 GHz+26%
Base Clock	2.9 GHz	4.5 GHz+55%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	64 MB (total)+433%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+25500%	1 MB (per core)
Process	14 nm	4 nm-71%
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Shimada Peak (2025)
PassMark	13,029	67,561+419%
Cinebench R23 Multi	8,191	40,000+388%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,454	3,016+107%
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,783	23,596+308%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F versus DDR5-6400 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX supports 140.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-10400F) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-10400F) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX offers 112 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and WRX90 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX).

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
Socket	LGA1200	sTR5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	DDR5-6400+140%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	2048 GB+1500%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	128+700%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX rivals Xeon w7-3555.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	true
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-10400F was priced at $160, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX came in at $429. On launch pricing ($160 vs $429), Core i5-10400F was $269 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 157.5 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX the 63.7% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
MSRP	$160-63%	$429
Performance per Dollar	81.4	157.5+93%
Release Date	2020	2025

Search Core i5-10400F on Amazon

Search Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.