
Core i5-10400F
Popular choices:

Ryzen Z1
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-10400F
2020Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen Z1.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Z1 across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 18,406).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Ryzen Z1 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
Ryzen Z1
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +28.4% higher average FPS across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Core i5-10400F
2020Ryzen Z1
2023Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen Z1.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +28.4% higher average FPS across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Z1 across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 18,406).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Ryzen Z1 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Z1 better than Core i5-10400F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen Z1 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 195 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 167 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 231 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 89 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen Z1 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 433 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 339 FPS |
| high | 290 FPS | 291 FPS |
| ultra | 253 FPS | 250 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 360 FPS |
| medium | 292 FPS | 295 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 261 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 219 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 309 FPS | 271 FPS |
| medium | 258 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 171 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen Z1 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 460 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 460 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 460 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 460 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 460 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 441 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 460 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 437 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 372 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 306 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen Z1 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 460 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 460 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 460 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 460 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 460 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 460 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 460 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 434 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 370 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Ryzen Z1

Core i5-10400F
Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.


Ryzen Z1
Ryzen Z1
The Ryzen Z1 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Maio 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,406 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Core i5-10400F and Ryzen Z1 share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen Z1 — a 13% clock advantage for the Ryzen Z1 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen Z1 uses Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Ryzen Z1's 18,406 — a 34.2% lead for the Ryzen Z1. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen Z1.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen Z1 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz | 4.9 GHz+14% |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz | 3.2 GHz+10% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 16 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 14 nm | 4 nm-71% |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) |
| PassMark | 13,029 | 18,406+41% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 8,191 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,454 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,783 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Z1 uses FP8 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen Z1 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) / not specified (Ryzen Z1). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Ryzen Z1 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












