
Core i5-10400F
Popular choices:

Steam Deck OLED APU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-10400F
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +141.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+200% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Steam Deck OLED APU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Steam Deck OLED APU mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌3150% higher power demand at 65W vs 2W.
Steam Deck OLED APU
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 65W, a 63W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (4,457 vs 13,029).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Core i5-10400F
2020Steam Deck OLED APU
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +141.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+200% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Steam Deck OLED APU.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 65W, a 63W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Steam Deck OLED APU mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌3150% higher power demand at 65W vs 2W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (4,457 vs 13,029).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-10400F better than Steam Deck OLED APU?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Steam Deck OLED APU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 107 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Steam Deck OLED APU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 290 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 253 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 292 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 309 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 258 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 64 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Steam Deck OLED APU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 111 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Steam Deck OLED APU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 111 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Steam Deck OLED APU

Core i5-10400F
Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Steam Deck OLED APU
Steam Deck OLED APU
The Steam Deck OLED APU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 9 November 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Van Gogh (Custom) (2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 6 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB + 4 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,457 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Steam Deck OLED APU offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i5-10400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 3.5 GHz on the Steam Deck OLED APU — a 20.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Steam Deck OLED APU uses Van Gogh (Custom) (2023) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Steam Deck OLED APU's 4,457 — a 98% lead for the Core i5-10400F. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 4 MB on the Steam Deck OLED APU.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Steam Deck OLED APU |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12+50% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz+23% | 3.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz+21% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total)+200% | 4 MB |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 2 MB+700% |
| Process | 14 nm | 6 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Van Gogh (Custom) (2023) |
| PassMark | 13,029+192% | 4,457 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 8,191 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,454 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,783 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) / not specified (Steam Deck OLED APU). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Steam Deck OLED APU |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












