PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $6,337 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $6,497 MSRP).
✅Delivers 420.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 15.7 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $6,497 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 330W, a 265W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon 6747P.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6747P across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (5,783 vs 45,000).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 6747P, which brings 48 cores / 96 threads and 88 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Xeon 6747P moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.

Xeon 6747P

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +59.8% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 48 cores / 96 threads, plus 88 PCIe lanes vs 16.
✅Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
✅450% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.7 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($6,497 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
❌407.7% higher power demand at 330W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Xeon 6747P

2025

Why buy it

✅Costs $6,337 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $6,497 MSRP).
✅Delivers 420.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 15.7 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $6,497 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 330W, a 265W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon 6747P.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +59.8% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 48 cores / 96 threads, plus 88 PCIe lanes vs 16.
✅Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
✅450% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6747P across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (5,783 vs 45,000).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 6747P, which brings 48 cores / 96 threads and 88 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Xeon 6747P moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.7 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($6,497 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
❌407.7% higher power demand at 330W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon 6747P better than Core i5-10400F?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon 6747P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-10400F is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon 6747P is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 59.8% more average FPS across 3 shared CPU game tests. It also has a big cache advantage at 288 MB vs 12 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6747P is the better fit. You are getting 678.1% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 48 cores and 96 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 2300% larger total L3 cache (288 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon 6747P is the smarter buy by a wide margin for a fresh build. Xeon 6747P is 3960.6% more expensive on MSRP at $6,497 MSRP versus $160 MSRP, and it gives you a 59.8% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-10400F only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that is mostly used-market pricing on an obsolete 2020 platform. Even with 420.3% better value on paper (81.4 vs 15.7 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a very cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1200.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6747P is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2020), a healthier platform with LGA4710 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, 3D V-Cache and a much larger 288 MB L3 cache instead of 12 MB, more multi-core headroom with 48 cores / 96 threads instead of 6/12, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-10400F Benchmark Check

Xeon 6747P Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Xeon 6747P
1080p
low	192 FPS	188 FPS
medium	152 FPS	165 FPS
high	123 FPS	131 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	106 FPS
1440p
low	153 FPS	155 FPS
medium	119 FPS	131 FPS
high	97 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	79 FPS	82 FPS
4K
low	82 FPS	70 FPS
medium	70 FPS	63 FPS
high	55 FPS	49 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	40 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Xeon 6747P

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Xeon 6747P
1080p
low	326 FPS	520 FPS
medium	318 FPS	460 FPS
high	290 FPS	376 FPS
ultra	253 FPS	309 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	425 FPS
medium	292 FPS	383 FPS
high	267 FPS	321 FPS
ultra	234 FPS	256 FPS
4K
low	309 FPS	262 FPS
medium	258 FPS	239 FPS
high	235 FPS	212 FPS
ultra	199 FPS	176 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Xeon 6747P

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Xeon 6747P
1080p
low	326 FPS	849 FPS
medium	326 FPS	768 FPS
high	326 FPS	730 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	641 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	737 FPS
medium	326 FPS	662 FPS
high	326 FPS	626 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	558 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	493 FPS
medium	326 FPS	402 FPS
high	289 FPS	364 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	303 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Xeon 6747P

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Xeon 6747P
1080p
low	326 FPS	1034 FPS
medium	326 FPS	916 FPS
high	326 FPS	789 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	670 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	848 FPS
medium	326 FPS	727 FPS
high	326 FPS	623 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	525 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	613 FPS
medium	326 FPS	538 FPS
high	326 FPS	474 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	403 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Xeon 6747P

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Xeon 6747P

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Xeon 6747P

The Xeon 6747P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 288 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 330 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s), MRDIMM(8800MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 101,685 points. Launch price was $6,497.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon 6747P offers 48 cores / 96 threads — the Xeon 6747P has 42 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon 6747P — a 9.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon 6747P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Xeon 6747P's 101,685 — a 154.6% lead for the Xeon 6747P. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,454 vs 2,000, a 31.6% lead for the Xeon 6747P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 5,783 vs 45,000 (154.4% advantage for the Xeon 6747P). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 288 MB (total) on the Xeon 6747P.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Xeon 6747P
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	48 / 96+700%
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz+10%	3.9 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+7%	2.7 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	288 MB (total)+2300%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	2 MB (per core)+700%
Process	14 nm	Intel 3 nm-79%
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Granite Rapids (2024−2025)
PassMark	13,029	101,685+680%
Cinebench R23 Multi	8,191	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,454	2,000+38%
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,783	45,000+678%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon 6747P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F versus DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6747P — the Xeon 6747P supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon 6747P supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-10400F) vs 8 (Xeon 6747P). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-10400F) vs 88 (Xeon 6747P) — the Xeon 6747P offers 72 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and C741 (Xeon 6747P).

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Xeon 6747P
Socket	LGA1200	LGA4710
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	DDR5-6400+25%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	4096 GB+3100%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	88+450%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon 6747P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming, Xeon 6747P targets High Performance Server. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600; Xeon 6747P rivals EPYC 9555.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Xeon 6747P
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Gaming	High Performance Server

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-10400F launched at $160 MSRP, while the Xeon 6747P debuted at $6497. On MSRP ($160 vs $6497), the Core i5-10400F is $6337 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 15.7 pts/$ for the Xeon 6747P — making the Core i5-10400F the 135.5% better value option.