
Core i5-10400F
Popular choices:

Xeon D-2183IT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-10400F
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 100W, a 35W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon D-2183IT.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 19,377).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 22 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-2183IT, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Xeon D-2183IT mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon D-2183IT
2018Why buy it
- ✅+48.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅+83.3% larger total L3 cache (22 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌53.8% higher power demand at 100W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Core i5-10400F
2020Xeon D-2183IT
2018Why buy it
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 100W, a 35W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon D-2183IT.
Why buy it
- ✅+48.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅+83.3% larger total L3 cache (22 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 19,377).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 22 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-2183IT, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Xeon D-2183IT mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌53.8% higher power demand at 100W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-10400F better than Xeon D-2183IT?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Xeon D-2183IT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Xeon D-2183IT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 290 FPS | 145 FPS |
| ultra | 253 FPS | 119 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 292 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 309 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 258 FPS | 97 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 68 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Xeon D-2183IT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 468 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 406 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 446 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 386 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 335 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 401 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 310 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 265 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 213 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Xeon D-2183IT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 484 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 484 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 484 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 415 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 449 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 401 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 357 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 306 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Xeon D-2183IT

Core i5-10400F
Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Xeon D-2183IT
Xeon D-2183IT
The Xeon D-2183IT is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 February 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2518. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 19,377 points. Launch price was $1,764.
Processing Power
The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon D-2183IT offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon D-2183IT has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 3 GHz on the Xeon D-2183IT — a 35.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon D-2183IT uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Xeon D-2183IT's 19,377 — a 39.2% lead for the Xeon D-2183IT. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 22 MB on the Xeon D-2183IT.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Xeon D-2183IT |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 16 / 32+167% |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz+43% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz+32% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 22 MB+83% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 16 MB+6300% |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 13,029 | 19,377+49% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 8,191 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,454 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,783 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon D-2183IT uses FCBGA2518 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Xeon D-2183IT |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | FCBGA2518 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) / not specified (Xeon D-2183IT). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Xeon D-2183IT |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












