Core i5-10400F vs Xeon D-2775TE

Intel

Core i5-10400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2020

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Xeon D-2775TE

16 Cores32 Thrd100 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2022

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

  • Draws 65W instead of 100W, a 35W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon D-2775TE.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 27,299).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 25 MB).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-2775TE, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
  • Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Xeon D-2775TE mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon D-2775TE

2022

Why buy it

  • +109.5% higher PassMark.
  • +108.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 12 MB).
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.

Trade-offs

  • 53.8% higher power demand at 100W vs 65W.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon D-2775TE better than Core i5-10400F?
Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon D-2775TE makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-10400F is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon D-2775TE is the better fit. You are getting 109.5% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 108.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 12 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon D-2775TE is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-10400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Xeon D-2775TE is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $160 MSRP, and it gives you 109.5% better PassMark. The trade-off is that Core i5-10400F is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-10400F is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (81.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon D-2775TE is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2020), 108.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 12 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i5-10400FXeon D-2775TE
1080p
low192 FPS177 FPS
medium152 FPS146 FPS
high123 FPS117 FPS
ultra100 FPS93 FPS
1440p
low153 FPS144 FPS
medium119 FPS115 FPS
high97 FPS90 FPS
ultra79 FPS71 FPS
4K
low82 FPS68 FPS
medium70 FPS58 FPS
high55 FPS45 FPS
ultra43 FPS36 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i5-10400FXeon D-2775TE
1080p
low326 FPS205 FPS
medium318 FPS182 FPS
high290 FPS155 FPS
ultra253 FPS127 FPS
1440p
low326 FPS176 FPS
medium292 FPS161 FPS
high267 FPS140 FPS
ultra234 FPS113 FPS
4K
low309 FPS114 FPS
medium258 FPS106 FPS
high235 FPS94 FPS
ultra199 FPS75 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i5-10400FXeon D-2775TE
1080p
low326 FPS682 FPS
medium326 FPS581 FPS
high326 FPS504 FPS
ultra326 FPS441 FPS
1440p
low326 FPS587 FPS
medium326 FPS478 FPS
high326 FPS415 FPS
ultra326 FPS362 FPS
4K
low326 FPS429 FPS
medium326 FPS333 FPS
high289 FPS285 FPS
ultra229 FPS229 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i5-10400FXeon D-2775TE
1080p
low326 FPS682 FPS
medium326 FPS682 FPS
high326 FPS642 FPS
ultra326 FPS548 FPS
1440p
low326 FPS659 FPS
medium326 FPS573 FPS
high326 FPS492 FPS
ultra326 FPS419 FPS
4K
low326 FPS450 FPS
medium326 FPS403 FPS
high326 FPS358 FPS
ultra326 FPS309 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Xeon D-2775TE

Intel

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Intel

Xeon D-2775TE

The Xeon D-2775TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2579. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 27,299 points. Launch price was $1,751.

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon D-2775TE offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon D-2775TE has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon D-2775TE — a 32.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon D-2775TE uses Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Xeon D-2775TE's 27,299 — a 70.8% lead for the Xeon D-2775TE. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 25 MB (total) on the Xeon D-2775TE.

FeatureCore i5-10400FXeon D-2775TE
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
16 / 32+167%
Boost Clock
4.3 GHz+39%
3.1 GHz
Base Clock
2.9 GHz+45%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
25 MB (total)+108%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
1.25 MB (per core)+400%
Process
14 nm
10 nm-29%
Architecture
Comet Lake (2020−2025)
Ice Lake-D (2022−2023)
PassMark
13,029
27,299+110%
Cinebench R23 Multi
8,191
Geekbench 6 Single
1,454
Geekbench 6 Multi
5,783
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon D-2775TE uses FCBGA2579 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-10400FXeon D-2775TE
Socket
LGA1200
FCBGA2579
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) / not specified (Xeon D-2775TE). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.

FeatureCore i5-10400FXeon D-2775TE
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Gaming