
Core i5-10400F
Popular choices:

Xeon E-2226G
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-10400F
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +22.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 80W, a 15W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E-2226G.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Xeon E-2226G mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E-2226G
2019Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (11,174 vs 13,029).
- ❌23.1% higher power demand at 80W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Core i5-10400F
2020Xeon E-2226G
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +22.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 80W, a 15W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E-2226G.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Xeon E-2226G mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (11,174 vs 13,029).
- ❌23.1% higher power demand at 80W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-10400F better than Xeon E-2226G?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Xeon E-2226G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 45 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Xeon E-2226G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 279 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 261 FPS |
| high | 290 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 253 FPS | 204 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 279 FPS |
| medium | 292 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 213 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 185 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 309 FPS | 231 FPS |
| medium | 258 FPS | 194 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 149 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Xeon E-2226G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 279 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 279 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 279 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 279 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 279 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 279 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 279 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 279 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 279 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 269 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 229 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 186 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Xeon E-2226G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 279 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 279 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 279 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 279 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 279 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 279 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 279 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 279 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 279 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 279 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 279 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 279 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Xeon E-2226G

Core i5-10400F
Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Xeon E-2226G
Xeon E-2226G
The Xeon E-2226G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 May 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 11,174 points. Launch price was $255.
Processing Power
The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, matching the Xeon E-2226G's 6 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 4.7 GHz on the Xeon E-2226G — a 8.9% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2226G (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E-2226G uses Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Xeon E-2226G's 11,174 — a 15.3% lead for the Core i5-10400F. Both processors carry 12 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Xeon E-2226G |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 6 / 6 |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz | 4.7 GHz+9% |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz | 3.4 GHz+17% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) |
| PassMark | 13,029+17% | 11,174 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 8,191 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,454 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,783 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E-2226G uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Xeon E-2226G |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) / not specified (Xeon E-2226G). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Xeon E-2226G |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












