
Core i5-10400F

Xeon E-2278G
Core i5-10400F vs Xeon E-2278G Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-10400F vs Xeon E-2278G FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-10400F vs Xeon E-2278G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-10400F
2020Why buy it
- β Draws 65W instead of 80W, a 15W reduction.
- β Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E-2278G.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E-2278G across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (13,029 vs 16,825).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E-2278G, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
- βLaunch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Xeon E-2278G mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E-2278G
2019Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +22.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics P630, while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- β23.1% higher power demand at 80W vs 65W.
- βNo boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E-2278G better than Core i5-10400F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-10400F vs Xeon E-2278G Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020β2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Xeon E-2278G
The Xeon E-2278G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 May 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-S WS (2018β2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 16,825 points. Launch price was $494.
Processing Power
The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E-2278G offers 8 cores / 16 threads β the Xeon E-2278G has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 5 GHz on the Xeon E-2278G β a 15.1% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2278G (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020β2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E-2278G uses Coffee Lake-S WS (2018β2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Xeon E-2278G's 16,825 β a 25.4% lead for the Xeon E-2278G. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 16 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2278G.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Xeon E-2278G |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz | 5 GHz+16% |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz | 3.4 GHz+17% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 16 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020β2025) | Coffee Lake-S WS (2018β2019) |
| PassMark | 13,029 | 16,825+29% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 8,191 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,454 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,783 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E-2278G uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2666 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and C242,C246 (Xeon E-2278G).
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Xeon E-2278G |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) vs VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Xeon E-2278G). The Xeon E-2278G includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics P630), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming, Xeon E-2278G targets Server. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Xeon E-2278G |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | β | Intel UHD Graphics P630 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x / VT-d / EPT |
| Target Use | Gaming | Server |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













