Core i5-10400F vs Xeon E-2334

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

✅+5.4% higher PassMark.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E-2334.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Xeon E-2334 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E-2334

2021

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (12,364 vs 13,029).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Xeon E-2334

2021

Why buy it

✅+5.4% higher PassMark.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E-2334.

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Xeon E-2334 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (12,364 vs 13,029).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-10400F better than Xeon E-2334?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon E-2334 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-10400F is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-10400F is the better fit. You are getting 5.4% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-10400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-10400F is at an unclear MSRP at $160 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you 5.4% better PassMark. The trade-off is that Xeon E-2334 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 1.5% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (81.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E-2334 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2020). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-10400F Benchmark Check

Xeon E-2334 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Xeon E-2334
1080p
low	192 FPS	290 FPS
medium	152 FPS	254 FPS
high	123 FPS	213 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	183 FPS
1440p
low	153 FPS	240 FPS
medium	119 FPS	190 FPS
high	97 FPS	155 FPS
ultra	79 FPS	136 FPS
4K
low	82 FPS	166 FPS
medium	70 FPS	134 FPS
high	55 FPS	103 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	90 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Xeon E-2334

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Xeon E-2334
1080p
low	326 FPS	309 FPS
medium	318 FPS	287 FPS
high	290 FPS	257 FPS
ultra	253 FPS	219 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	304 FPS
medium	292 FPS	244 FPS
high	267 FPS	221 FPS
ultra	234 FPS	187 FPS
4K
low	309 FPS	229 FPS
medium	258 FPS	189 FPS
high	235 FPS	158 FPS
ultra	199 FPS	129 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Xeon E-2334

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Xeon E-2334
1080p
low	326 FPS	309 FPS
medium	326 FPS	309 FPS
high	326 FPS	309 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	309 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	309 FPS
medium	326 FPS	309 FPS
high	326 FPS	309 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	309 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	309 FPS
medium	326 FPS	309 FPS
high	289 FPS	309 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	295 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Xeon E-2334

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Xeon E-2334
1080p
low	326 FPS	309 FPS
medium	326 FPS	309 FPS
high	326 FPS	309 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	309 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	309 FPS
medium	326 FPS	309 FPS
high	326 FPS	309 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	309 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	309 FPS
medium	326 FPS	309 FPS
high	326 FPS	309 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	309 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Xeon E-2334

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Xeon E-2334

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Xeon E-2334

The Xeon E-2334 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Rocket Lake-E (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 12,364 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E-2334 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i5-10400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon E-2334 — a 11% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2334 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E-2334 uses Rocket Lake-E (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Xeon E-2334's 12,364 — a 5.2% lead for the Core i5-10400F. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2334.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Xeon E-2334
Cores / Threads	6 / 12+50%	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz	4.8 GHz+12%
Base Clock	2.9 GHz	3.4 GHz+17%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)+50%	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512K (per core)+100%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Rocket Lake-E (2021)
PassMark	13,029+5%	12,364
Cinebench R23 Multi	8,191	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,454	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,783	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA1200 socket with PCIe 3.0.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Xeon E-2334
Socket	LGA1200	LGA1200
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) / not specified (Xeon E-2334). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.