
Core i5-10400F
Popular choices:

Xeon E3-1245 v6
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-10400F
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +44.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 73W, a 8W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E3-1245 v6.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Xeon E3-1245 v6 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E3-1245 v6
2017Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,711 vs 13,029).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Core i5-10400F
2020Xeon E3-1245 v6
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +44.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 73W, a 8W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E3-1245 v6.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Xeon E3-1245 v6 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,711 vs 13,029).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-10400F better than Xeon E3-1245 v6?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Xeon E3-1245 v6 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Xeon E3-1245 v6 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 290 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 253 FPS | 169 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 292 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 176 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 151 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 309 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 258 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 111 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Xeon E3-1245 v6 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 218 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 218 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 218 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 218 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 218 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 218 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Xeon E3-1245 v6 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 218 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 218 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 218 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 218 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 218 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 218 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Xeon E3-1245 v6

Core i5-10400F
Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Xeon E3-1245 v6
Xeon E3-1245 v6
The Xeon E3-1245 v6 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 28 March 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400, DDR3L-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 8,711 points. Launch price was $284.
Processing Power
The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E3-1245 v6 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i5-10400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon E3-1245 v6 — a 4.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E3-1245 v6 uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Xeon E3-1245 v6's 8,711 — a 39.7% lead for the Core i5-10400F. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 8 MB on the Xeon E3-1245 v6.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Xeon E3-1245 v6 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12+50% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz+5% | 4.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz | 3.7 GHz+28% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total)+50% | 8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 1 MB+300% |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) |
| PassMark | 13,029+50% | 8,711 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 8,191 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,454 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,783 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E3-1245 v6 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Xeon E3-1245 v6 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) / not specified (Xeon E3-1245 v6). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Xeon E3-1245 v6 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












