Core i5-10400F vs Xeon E5-2640 v4

Intel

Core i5-10400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2020

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2640 v4

10 Cores20 Thrd90 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2016

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

  • Draws 65W instead of 90W, a 25W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E5-2640 v4.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 25 MB).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2640 v4, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.
  • Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2640 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-2640 v4

2016

Why buy it

  • +108.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 12 MB).
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (12,470 vs 13,029).
  • 38.5% higher power demand at 90W vs 65W.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-10400F better than Xeon E5-2640 v4?
Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon E5-2640 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-10400F is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i5-10400F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 0.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-10400F is the better fit. You are getting 4.5% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-10400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-10400F is at an unclear MSRP at $160 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (81.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-10400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2016) and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 10/20. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i5-10400FXeon E5-2640 v4
1080p
low192 FPS160 FPS
medium152 FPS140 FPS
high123 FPS113 FPS
ultra100 FPS93 FPS
1440p
low153 FPS135 FPS
medium119 FPS115 FPS
high97 FPS89 FPS
ultra79 FPS73 FPS
4K
low82 FPS63 FPS
medium70 FPS57 FPS
high55 FPS44 FPS
ultra43 FPS35 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i5-10400FXeon E5-2640 v4
1080p
low326 FPS312 FPS
medium318 FPS290 FPS
high290 FPS253 FPS
ultra253 FPS208 FPS
1440p
low326 FPS278 FPS
medium292 FPS254 FPS
high267 FPS222 FPS
ultra234 FPS181 FPS
4K
low309 FPS180 FPS
medium258 FPS164 FPS
high235 FPS144 FPS
ultra199 FPS114 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i5-10400FXeon E5-2640 v4
1080p
low326 FPS312 FPS
medium326 FPS312 FPS
high326 FPS312 FPS
ultra326 FPS312 FPS
1440p
low326 FPS312 FPS
medium326 FPS312 FPS
high326 FPS312 FPS
ultra326 FPS312 FPS
4K
low326 FPS312 FPS
medium326 FPS312 FPS
high289 FPS312 FPS
ultra229 FPS279 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i5-10400FXeon E5-2640 v4
1080p
low326 FPS312 FPS
medium326 FPS312 FPS
high326 FPS312 FPS
ultra326 FPS312 FPS
1440p
low326 FPS312 FPS
medium326 FPS312 FPS
high326 FPS312 FPS
ultra326 FPS312 FPS
4K
low326 FPS312 FPS
medium326 FPS312 FPS
high326 FPS312 FPS
ultra326 FPS312 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Xeon E5-2640 v4

Intel

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Intel

Xeon E5-2640 v4

The Xeon E5-2640 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB. L2 cache: 2.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 90 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 12,470 points. Launch price was $939.

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2640 v4 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon E5-2640 v4 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon E5-2640 v4 — a 23.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2640 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Xeon E5-2640 v4's 12,470 — a 4.4% lead for the Core i5-10400F. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 25 MB on the Xeon E5-2640 v4.

FeatureCore i5-10400FXeon E5-2640 v4
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
10 / 20+67%
Boost Clock
4.3 GHz+26%
3.4 GHz
Base Clock
2.9 GHz+21%
2.4 GHz
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
25 MB+108%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
2.5 MB+900%
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Comet Lake (2020−2025)
Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark
13,029+4%
12,470
Cinebench R23 Multi
8,191
Geekbench 6 Single
1,454
Geekbench 6 Multi
5,783
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2640 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-10400FXeon E5-2640 v4
Socket
LGA1200
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) / not specified (Xeon E5-2640 v4). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.

FeatureCore i5-10400FXeon E5-2640 v4
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Gaming