
Core i5-10400F
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 5418Y
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-10400F
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,323 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $1,483 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 164.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 30.8 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $1,483 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 185W, a 120W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon Gold 5418Y.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 5418Y across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 45,660).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 45 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 5418Y, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 80 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Xeon Gold 5418Y moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Xeon Gold 5418Y
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +60.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+275% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 80 PCIe lanes vs 16.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
- ✅400% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 30.8 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($1,483 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
- ❌184.6% higher power demand at 185W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Core i5-10400F
2020Xeon Gold 5418Y
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,323 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $1,483 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 164.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 30.8 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $1,483 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 185W, a 120W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon Gold 5418Y.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +60.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+275% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 80 PCIe lanes vs 16.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
- ✅400% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 5418Y across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 45,660).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 45 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 5418Y, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 80 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Xeon Gold 5418Y moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 30.8 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($1,483 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
- ❌184.6% higher power demand at 185W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 5418Y better than Core i5-10400F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Xeon Gold 5418Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 39 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Xeon Gold 5418Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 290 FPS | 194 FPS |
| ultra | 253 FPS | 162 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 292 FPS | 203 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 137 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 309 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 258 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 97 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Xeon Gold 5418Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 982 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 859 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 814 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 724 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 803 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 693 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 647 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 575 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 513 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 405 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 355 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 290 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Xeon Gold 5418Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 926 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 837 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 721 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 623 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 717 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 631 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 541 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 463 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 518 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 463 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 406 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 351 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Xeon Gold 5418Y

Core i5-10400F
Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Xeon Gold 5418Y
Xeon Gold 5418Y
The Xeon Gold 5418Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 185 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 45,660 points. Launch price was $1,493.
Processing Power
The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5418Y offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Gold 5418Y has 18 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5418Y — a 12.3% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5418Y uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Xeon Gold 5418Y's 45,660 — a 111.2% lead for the Xeon Gold 5418Y. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 45 MB on the Xeon Gold 5418Y.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Xeon Gold 5418Y |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 24 / 48+300% |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz+13% | 3.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz+45% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 45 MB+275% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+700% |
| Process | 14 nm | Intel 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 13,029 | 45,660+250% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 8,191 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,454 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,783 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Gold 5418Y uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F versus 4800 on the Xeon Gold 5418Y — the Xeon Gold 5418Y supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 5418Y supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-10400F) vs 8 (Xeon Gold 5418Y). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-10400F) vs 80 (Xeon Gold 5418Y) — the Xeon Gold 5418Y offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and C741 (Xeon Gold 5418Y).
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Xeon Gold 5418Y |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | 4800+119900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+3276700% | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 80+400% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Gold 5418Y supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600; Xeon Gold 5418Y rivals EPYC 9334.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Xeon Gold 5418Y |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-10400F launched at $160 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 5418Y debuted at $1483. On MSRP ($160 vs $1483), the Core i5-10400F is $1323 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 30.8 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 5418Y — making the Core i5-10400F the 90.3% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Xeon Gold 5418Y |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $160-89% | $1483 |
| Performance per Dollar | 81.4+164% | 30.8 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












