
Core i5-10400F
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6242
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-10400F
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 150W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon Gold 6242.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6242 across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 24,994).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 22 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6242, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6242 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon Gold 6242
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +41.3% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+83.3% larger total L3 cache (22 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌130.8% higher power demand at 150W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Core i5-10400F
2020Xeon Gold 6242
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 150W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon Gold 6242.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +41.3% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+83.3% larger total L3 cache (22 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6242 across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 24,994).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 22 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6242, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6242 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌130.8% higher power demand at 150W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 6242 better than Core i5-10400F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Xeon Gold 6242 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Xeon Gold 6242 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 400 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 346 FPS |
| high | 290 FPS | 288 FPS |
| ultra | 253 FPS | 242 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 346 FPS |
| medium | 292 FPS | 307 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 256 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 213 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 309 FPS | 224 FPS |
| medium | 258 FPS | 199 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 146 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Xeon Gold 6242 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 625 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 625 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 625 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 625 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 625 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 612 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 580 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 512 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 462 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 361 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 261 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Xeon Gold 6242 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 625 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 625 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 625 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 576 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 625 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 598 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 517 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 444 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 468 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 421 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 377 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 328 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Xeon Gold 6242

Core i5-10400F
Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Xeon Gold 6242
Xeon Gold 6242
The Xeon Gold 6242 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 24,994 points. Launch price was $2,529.
Processing Power
The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6242 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon Gold 6242 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6242 — a 9.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6242 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Xeon Gold 6242's 24,994 — a 62.9% lead for the Xeon Gold 6242. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 22 MB on the Xeon Gold 6242.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Xeon Gold 6242 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 16 / 32+167% |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz+10% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz+4% | 2.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 22 MB+83% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 16 MB+6300% |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 13,029 | 24,994+92% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 8,191 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,454 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,783 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Gold 6242 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Xeon Gold 6242 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) / not specified (Xeon Gold 6242). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Xeon Gold 6242 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












