Core i5-10400F vs Xeon Gold 6348H

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-10400F vs Xeon Gold 6348H FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-10400F vs Xeon Gold 6348H: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +30.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 65W instead of 165W, a 100W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon Gold 6348H.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 33 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6348H, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6348H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon Gold 6348H

2021

Why buy it

✅+175% larger total L3 cache (33 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (5,967 vs 13,029).
❌153.8% higher power demand at 165W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-10400F better than Xeon Gold 6348H?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon Gold 6348H makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-10400F is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-10400F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 30.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-10400F is the stronger fit. You are getting 118.4% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-10400F is the better buy right now. Core i5-10400F comes in at an unclear MSRP at $160 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 30.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (81.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Gold 6348H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2020) and 175% larger total L3 cache (33 MB vs 12 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-10400F vs Xeon Gold 6348H Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Xeon Gold 6348H

The Xeon Gold 6348H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Cooper Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 RDIMM. Passmark benchmark score: 5,967 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6348H offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Gold 6348H has 18 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 4.2 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6348H — a 2.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6348H uses Cooper Lake-SP (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Xeon Gold 6348H's 5,967 — a 74.4% lead for the Core i5-10400F. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 33 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 6348H.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Xeon Gold 6348H
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	24 / 48+300%
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz+2%	4.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+26%	2.3 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	33 MB (total)+175%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+25500%	1 MB (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Cooper Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark	13,029+118%	5,967
Cinebench R23 Multi	8,191	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,454	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,783	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Gold 6348H uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Xeon Gold 6348H
Socket	LGA1200	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) / not specified (Xeon Gold 6348H). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.