Core i5-10400F vs Xeon Platinum 8562Y+

Intel

Core i5-10400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2020
Core family
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon Platinum 8562Y+

32 Cores64 Thrd300 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2023
Similar parts
·······

Core i5-10400F vs Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-10400F vs Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-10400F vs Xeon Platinum 8562Y+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

  • Costs $5,785 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $5,945 MSRP).
  • Delivers 864.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 8.4 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $5,945 MSRP).
  • Draws 65W instead of 300W, a 235W reduction.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon Platinum 8562Y+.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 50,189).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 60 MB).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Platinum 8562Y+, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 80 PCIe lanes.
  • Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Xeon Platinum 8562Y+

2023

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +26.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +400% larger total L3 cache (60 MB vs 12 MB).
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 80 PCIe lanes vs 16.
  • Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
  • 400% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.4 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($5,945 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
  • 361.5% higher power demand at 300W vs 65W.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ better than Core i5-10400F?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-10400F is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 26.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 285.2% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 400% larger total L3 cache (60 MB vs 12 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-10400F is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ comes in 3615.6% more expensive on MSRP at $5,945 MSRP versus $160 MSRP, and it still gives you a 26.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-10400F is also 864.6% better value on MSRP (81.4 vs 8.4 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2020), a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, 400% larger total L3 cache (60 MB vs 12 MB), more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 6/12, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-10400F vs Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Intel

Xeon Platinum 8562Y+

The Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 60 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 50,189 points. Launch price was $5,945.

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ has 26 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ — a 4.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+'s 50,189 — a 117.6% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 60 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+.

FeatureCore i5-10400FXeon Platinum 8562Y+
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
32 / 64+433%
Boost Clock
4.3 GHz+5%
4.1 GHz
Base Clock
2.9 GHz+4%
2.8 GHz
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
60 MB (total)+400%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)+12700%
2 MB (per core)
Process
14 nm
10 nm-29%
Architecture
Comet Lake (2020−2025)
Emerald Rapids (2023)
PassMark
13,029
50,189+285%
Cinebench R23 Multi
8,191
Geekbench 6 Single
1,454
Geekbench 6 Multi
5,783
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F versus 5600 on the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ — the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ supports 110.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB 3100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-10400F) vs 8 (Xeon Platinum 8562Y+). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-10400F) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8562Y+) — the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and C741 (Xeon Platinum 8562Y+).

FeatureCore i5-10400FXeon Platinum 8562Y+
Socket
LGA1200
LGA4677
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
5600+110%
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
4096 GB+3100%
RAM Channels
2
8+300%
ECC Support
No
Yes
PCIe Lanes
16
80+400%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600; Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ rivals EPYC 9474F.

FeatureCore i5-10400FXeon Platinum 8562Y+
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Gaming
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-10400F was priced at $160, while the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ came in at $5945. On launch pricing ($160 vs $5945), Core i5-10400F was $5785 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 8.4 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ — making the Core i5-10400F the 162.4% better value option.

FeatureCore i5-10400FXeon Platinum 8562Y+
MSRP
$160-97%
$5945
Performance per Dollar
81.4+869%
8.4
Release Date
2020
2023

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.