PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-10400F vs Xeon W-1290TE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-10400F vs Xeon W-1290TE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

✅+133.4% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅Costs $392 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $552 MSRP).
✅Delivers 209.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 26.3 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $552 MSRP).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon W-1290TE.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-1290TE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-1290TE, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Xeon W-1290TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Xeon W-1290TE

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics P630, while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (2,478 vs 5,783).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 26.3 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($552 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-1290TE better than Core i5-10400F?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W-1290TE makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-10400F is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-10400F is the stronger fit. You are getting 133.4% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W-1290TE is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-10400F is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon W-1290TE comes in 245.0% more expensive on MSRP at $552 MSRP versus $160 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core i5-10400F is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 133.4% better Geekbench multi-core. Core i5-10400F is also 209.9% better value on MSRP (81.4 vs 26.3 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon W-1290TE is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Core i5-10400F vs Xeon W-1290TE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Xeon W-1290TE

The Xeon W-1290TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 13 May 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,505 points. Launch price was $552.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon W-1290TE offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon W-1290TE has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 4.5 GHz on the Xeon W-1290TE — a 4.5% clock advantage for the Xeon W-1290TE (base: 2.9 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). Both are built on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture using a 14 nm process. In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Xeon W-1290TE's 14,505 — a 10.7% lead for the Xeon W-1290TE. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,454 vs 2,507, a 53.2% lead for the Xeon W-1290TE that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 5,783 vs 2,478 (80% advantage for the Core i5-10400F). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 20 MB (total) on the Xeon W-1290TE.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Xeon W-1290TE
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	10 / 20+67%
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz	4.5 GHz+5%
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+61%	1.8 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	20 MB (total)+67%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Comet Lake (2020−2025)
PassMark	13,029	14,505+11%
Cinebench R23 Multi	8,191	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,454	2,507+72%
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,783+133%	2,478

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA1200 socket with PCIe 3.0. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon W-1290TE — the Xeon W-1290TE supports 10% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and W480 (Xeon W-1290TE).

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Xeon W-1290TE
Socket	LGA1200	LGA1200
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	DDR4-2933+10%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Xeon W-1290TE includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics P630), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming, Xeon W-1290TE targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Xeon W-1290TE
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Intel UHD Graphics P630
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Gaming	Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-10400F was priced at $160, while the Xeon W-1290TE came in at $552. On launch pricing ($160 vs $552), Core i5-10400F was $392 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 26.3 pts/$ for the Xeon W-1290TE — making the Core i5-10400F the 102.4% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Xeon W-1290TE
MSRP	$160-71%	$552
Performance per Dollar	81.4+210%	26.3
Release Date	2020	2020

Search Core i5-10400F on Amazon

Search Xeon W-1290TE on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.