Core i5-10400F vs Xeon W-1350P

Intel

Core i5-10400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2020

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Xeon W-1350P

6 Cores12 Thrd125 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2021

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

  • Costs $151 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $311 MSRP).
  • Delivers 29.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 63.1 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $311 MSRP).
  • Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon W-1350P.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-1350P across 25 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 19,611).

Xeon W-1350P

2021

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +10.7% higher average FPS across 25 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 63.1 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($311 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
  • 92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-1350P better than Core i5-10400F?
Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon W-1350P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-10400F is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Xeon W-1350P is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 10.7% more average FPS across 25 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-1350P is the better fit. You are getting 50.5% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon W-1350P is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-10400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Xeon W-1350P is 94.4% more expensive on MSRP at $311 MSRP versus $160 MSRP, and it gives you a 10.7% average FPS lead across 25 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-10400F is also 29.1% better value on MSRP (81.4 vs 63.1 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon W-1350P is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2020) and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i5-10400FXeon W-1350P
1080p
low192 FPS261 FPS
medium152 FPS239 FPS
high123 FPS199 FPS
ultra100 FPS171 FPS
1440p
low153 FPS227 FPS
medium119 FPS189 FPS
high97 FPS153 FPS
ultra79 FPS134 FPS
4K
low82 FPS156 FPS
medium70 FPS130 FPS
high55 FPS100 FPS
ultra43 FPS88 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i5-10400FXeon W-1350P
1080p
low326 FPS326 FPS
medium318 FPS274 FPS
high290 FPS250 FPS
ultra253 FPS225 FPS
1440p
low326 FPS290 FPS
medium292 FPS245 FPS
high267 FPS225 FPS
ultra234 FPS201 FPS
4K
low309 FPS226 FPS
medium258 FPS194 FPS
high235 FPS182 FPS
ultra199 FPS148 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i5-10400FXeon W-1350P
1080p
low326 FPS490 FPS
medium326 FPS490 FPS
high326 FPS449 FPS
ultra326 FPS388 FPS
1440p
low326 FPS490 FPS
medium326 FPS475 FPS
high326 FPS403 FPS
ultra326 FPS351 FPS
4K
low326 FPS391 FPS
medium326 FPS345 FPS
high289 FPS302 FPS
ultra229 FPS252 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i5-10400FXeon W-1350P
1080p
low326 FPS490 FPS
medium326 FPS490 FPS
high326 FPS490 FPS
ultra326 FPS490 FPS
1440p
low326 FPS490 FPS
medium326 FPS490 FPS
high326 FPS490 FPS
ultra326 FPS490 FPS
4K
low326 FPS490 FPS
medium326 FPS490 FPS
high326 FPS490 FPS
ultra326 FPS437 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Xeon W-1350P

Intel

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Intel

Xeon W-1350P

The Xeon W-1350P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake-S (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,611 points. Launch price was $311.

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-10400F and Xeon W-1350P share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 5.1 GHz on the Xeon W-1350P — a 17% clock advantage for the Xeon W-1350P (base: 2.9 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon W-1350P uses Rocket Lake-S (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Xeon W-1350P's 19,611 — a 40.3% lead for the Xeon W-1350P. Both processors carry 12 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureCore i5-10400FXeon W-1350P
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
6 / 12
Boost Clock
4.3 GHz
5.1 GHz+19%
Base Clock
2.9 GHz
4 GHz+38%
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
12 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
512 kB (per core)+100%
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Comet Lake (2020−2025)
Rocket Lake-S (2021)
PassMark
13,029
19,611+51%
Cinebench R23 Multi
8,191
Geekbench 6 Single
1,454
Geekbench 6 Multi
5,783
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA1200 socket with PCIe 3.0.

FeatureCore i5-10400FXeon W-1350P
Socket
LGA1200
LGA1200
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) / not specified (Xeon W-1350P). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.

FeatureCore i5-10400FXeon W-1350P
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Gaming
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-10400F launched at $160 MSRP, while the Xeon W-1350P debuted at $311. On MSRP ($160 vs $311), the Core i5-10400F is $151 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 63.1 pts/$ for the Xeon W-1350P — making the Core i5-10400F the 25.4% better value option.

FeatureCore i5-10400FXeon W-1350P
MSRP
$160-49%
$311
Performance per Dollar
81.4+29%
63.1
Release Date
2020
2021