
Core i5-10400F
Popular choices:

Xeon W-2170B
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-10400F
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 140W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon W-2170B.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-2170B across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 24,448).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 19 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-2170B, which brings 14 cores / 28 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Xeon W-2170B mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon W-2170B
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +66.2% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+60.4% larger total L3 cache (19 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 14 cores / 28 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌115.4% higher power demand at 140W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Core i5-10400F
2020Xeon W-2170B
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 140W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon W-2170B.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +66.2% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+60.4% larger total L3 cache (19 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 14 cores / 28 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-2170B across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 24,448).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 19 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-2170B, which brings 14 cores / 28 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Xeon W-2170B mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌115.4% higher power demand at 140W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon W-2170B better than Core i5-10400F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Xeon W-2170B |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 41 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Xeon W-2170B |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 430 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 380 FPS |
| high | 290 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 253 FPS | 298 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 378 FPS |
| medium | 292 FPS | 339 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 294 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 257 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 309 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 258 FPS | 219 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 204 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 178 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Xeon W-2170B |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 611 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 611 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 611 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 611 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 611 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 611 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 611 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 567 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 511 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 426 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 383 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 317 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-10400F | Xeon W-2170B |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 611 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 611 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 611 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 611 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 611 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 611 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 611 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 557 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 611 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 554 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 485 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 410 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Xeon W-2170B

Core i5-10400F
Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Xeon W-2170B
Xeon W-2170B
The Xeon W-2170B is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 24,448 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon W-2170B offers 14 cores / 28 threads — the Xeon W-2170B has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 4.3 GHz on the Xeon W-2170B — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon W-2170B uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Xeon W-2170B's 24,448 — a 60.9% lead for the Xeon W-2170B. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 19.25 MB (total) on the Xeon W-2170B.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Xeon W-2170B |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 14 / 28+133% |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz+16% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 19.25 MB (total)+60% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 13,029 | 24,448+88% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 8,191 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,454 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,783 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-2170B uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Xeon W-2170B |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | LGA2066 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) / not specified (Xeon W-2170B). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Core i5-10400F | Xeon W-2170B |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












