PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 140W, a 75W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon W-2195.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-2195 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (8,191 vs 21,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 25 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-2195, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 81.4 vs 186.5 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).

Xeon W-2195

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +29.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+106.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 16.
✅Costs $10 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
✅Delivers 129.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 186.5 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌115.4% higher power demand at 140W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Xeon W-2195

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 140W, a 75W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon W-2195.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +29.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+106.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 16.
✅Costs $10 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
✅Delivers 129.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 186.5 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-2195 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (8,191 vs 21,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 25 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-2195, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 81.4 vs 186.5 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌115.4% higher power demand at 140W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-2195 better than Core i5-10400F?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon W-2195 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-10400F is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon W-2195 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 29.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-2195 is the better fit. You are getting 156.4% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 18 cores and 36 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 106.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W-2195 is the smarter buy today. Xeon W-2195 is $10 cheaper on MSRP at $150 MSRP versus $160 MSRP, and it gives you a 29.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 129.0% better value on MSRP (186.5 vs 81.4 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-10400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2017). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-10400F Benchmark Check

Xeon W-2195 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Xeon W-2195
1080p
low	192 FPS	177 FPS
medium	152 FPS	143 FPS
high	123 FPS	117 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	93 FPS
1440p
low	153 FPS	145 FPS
medium	119 FPS	114 FPS
high	97 FPS	94 FPS
ultra	79 FPS	76 FPS
4K
low	82 FPS	78 FPS
medium	70 FPS	66 FPS
high	55 FPS	52 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	41 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Xeon W-2195

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Xeon W-2195
1080p
low	326 FPS	447 FPS
medium	318 FPS	385 FPS
high	290 FPS	327 FPS
ultra	253 FPS	294 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	394 FPS
medium	292 FPS	349 FPS
high	267 FPS	297 FPS
ultra	234 FPS	258 FPS
4K
low	309 FPS	259 FPS
medium	258 FPS	229 FPS
high	235 FPS	210 FPS
ultra	199 FPS	185 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Xeon W-2195

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Xeon W-2195
1080p
low	326 FPS	699 FPS
medium	326 FPS	699 FPS
high	326 FPS	699 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	699 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	699 FPS
medium	326 FPS	699 FPS
high	326 FPS	650 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	580 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	508 FPS
medium	326 FPS	414 FPS
high	289 FPS	365 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	298 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Xeon W-2195

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Xeon W-2195
1080p
low	326 FPS	699 FPS
medium	326 FPS	699 FPS
high	326 FPS	699 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	691 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	699 FPS
medium	326 FPS	699 FPS
high	326 FPS	648 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	554 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	604 FPS
medium	326 FPS	534 FPS
high	326 FPS	468 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	401 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Xeon W-2195

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Xeon W-2195

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Xeon W-2195

The Xeon W-2195 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 September 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400, DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 27,977 points. Launch price was $2,553.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon W-2195 offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon W-2195 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 4.3 GHz on the Xeon W-2195 — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon W-2195 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Xeon W-2195's 27,977 — a 72.9% lead for the Xeon W-2195. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 8,191 vs 21,000 (87.8% advantage for the Xeon W-2195). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,454 vs 1,300, a 11.2% lead for the Core i5-10400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 5,783 vs 10,002 (53.5% advantage for the Xeon W-2195). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 24.75 MB (total) on the Xeon W-2195.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Xeon W-2195
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	18 / 36+200%
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz	4.3 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+26%	2.3 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	24.75 MB (total)+106%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	1 MB (per core)+300%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	13,029	27,977+115%
Cinebench R23 Multi	8,191	21,000+156%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,454+12%	1,300
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,783	10,002+73%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-2195 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2666 memory speed. The Xeon W-2195 supports up to 512 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-10400F) vs 4 (Xeon W-2195). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-10400F) vs 48 (Xeon W-2195) — the Xeon W-2195 offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and C422 (Xeon W-2195).

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Xeon W-2195
Socket	LGA1200	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	512 GB+300%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	48+200%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon W-2195 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon W-2195). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming, Xeon W-2195 targets Scientific Workstation / Data Analysis. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600; Xeon W-2195 rivals Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Xeon W-2195
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Gaming	Scientific Workstation / Data Analysis

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-10400F launched at $160 MSRP, while the Xeon W-2195 debuted at $150. On MSRP ($160 vs $150), the Xeon W-2195 is $10 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 186.5 pts/$ for the Xeon W-2195 — making the Xeon W-2195 the 78.4% better value option.