PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-10400F vs Xeon W-2195 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-10400F vs Xeon W-2195: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 140W, a 75W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon W-2195.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-2195 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (8,191 vs 21,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 25 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-2195, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 81.4 vs 186.5 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).

Xeon W-2195

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +29.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+106.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 16.
✅Costs $10 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
✅Delivers 129.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 186.5 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌115.4% higher power demand at 140W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-2195 better than Core i5-10400F?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W-2195 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-10400F is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon W-2195 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 29.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-2195 is the stronger fit. You are getting 156.4% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 18 cores and 36 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 106.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W-2195 is the better buy right now. Xeon W-2195 comes in $10 cheaper on MSRP at $150 MSRP versus $160 MSRP, and it still gives you a 29.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 129.0% better value on MSRP (186.5 vs 81.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-10400F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2017). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-10400F vs Xeon W-2195 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Xeon W-2195

The Xeon W-2195 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 September 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400, DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 27,977 points. Launch price was $2,553.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon W-2195 offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon W-2195 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 4.3 GHz on the Xeon W-2195 — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon W-2195 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Xeon W-2195's 27,977 — a 72.9% lead for the Xeon W-2195. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 8,191 vs 21,000 (87.8% advantage for the Xeon W-2195). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,454 vs 1,300, a 11.2% lead for the Core i5-10400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 5,783 vs 10,002 (53.5% advantage for the Xeon W-2195). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 24.75 MB (total) on the Xeon W-2195.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Xeon W-2195
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	18 / 36+200%
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz	4.3 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+26%	2.3 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	24.75 MB (total)+106%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+25500%	1 MB (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	13,029	27,977+115%
Cinebench R23 Multi	8,191	21,000+156%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,454+12%	1,300
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,783	10,002+73%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-2195 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2666 memory speed. The Xeon W-2195 supports up to 512 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-10400F) vs 4 (Xeon W-2195). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-10400F) vs 48 (Xeon W-2195) — the Xeon W-2195 offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and C422 (Xeon W-2195).

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Xeon W-2195
Socket	LGA1200	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	512 GB+300%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	48+200%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon W-2195 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon W-2195). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming, Xeon W-2195 targets Scientific Workstation / Data Analysis. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600; Xeon W-2195 rivals Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Xeon W-2195
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Gaming	Scientific Workstation / Data Analysis

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-10400F was priced at $160, while the Xeon W-2195 came in at $150. On launch pricing ($160 vs $150), Xeon W-2195 was $10 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 186.5 pts/$ for the Xeon W-2195 — making the Xeon W-2195 the 78.4% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Xeon W-2195
MSRP	$160	$150-6%
Performance per Dollar	81.4	186.5+129%
Release Date	2020	2017

Search Core i5-10400F on Amazon

Search Xeon W-2195 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.