PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $369 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $529 MSRP).
✅Delivers 129.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 35.5 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $529 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 130W, a 65W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon w3-2425.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w3-2425 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 18,776).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 15 MB).
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Xeon w3-2425 moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Xeon w3-2425

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 35.5 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($529 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
❌100% higher power demand at 130W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Xeon w3-2425

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $369 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $529 MSRP).
✅Delivers 129.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 35.5 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $529 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 130W, a 65W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon w3-2425.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w3-2425 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 18,776).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 15 MB).
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Xeon w3-2425 moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 35.5 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($529 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
❌100% higher power demand at 130W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon w3-2425 better than Core i5-10400F?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon w3-2425 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-10400F is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon w3-2425 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 8.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon w3-2425 is the better fit. You are getting 44.1% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon w3-2425 is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-10400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Xeon w3-2425 is 230.6% more expensive on MSRP at $529 MSRP versus $160 MSRP, and it gives you a 8.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-10400F is also 129.4% better value on MSRP (81.4 vs 35.5 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon w3-2425 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2020), a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, 25% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 12 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 6/12. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-10400F Benchmark Check

Xeon w3-2425 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Xeon w3-2425
1080p
low	192 FPS	184 FPS
medium	152 FPS	152 FPS
high	123 FPS	125 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	104 FPS
1440p
low	153 FPS	149 FPS
medium	119 FPS	120 FPS
high	97 FPS	98 FPS
ultra	79 FPS	80 FPS
4K
low	82 FPS	83 FPS
medium	70 FPS	71 FPS
high	55 FPS	57 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	45 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Xeon w3-2425

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Xeon w3-2425
1080p
low	326 FPS	357 FPS
medium	318 FPS	295 FPS
high	290 FPS	261 FPS
ultra	253 FPS	226 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	317 FPS
medium	292 FPS	269 FPS
high	267 FPS	243 FPS
ultra	234 FPS	206 FPS
4K
low	309 FPS	248 FPS
medium	258 FPS	215 FPS
high	235 FPS	197 FPS
ultra	199 FPS	166 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Xeon w3-2425

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Xeon w3-2425
1080p
low	326 FPS	469 FPS
medium	326 FPS	469 FPS
high	326 FPS	469 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	469 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	469 FPS
medium	326 FPS	469 FPS
high	326 FPS	469 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	469 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	469 FPS
medium	326 FPS	415 FPS
high	289 FPS	354 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	280 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Xeon w3-2425

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Xeon w3-2425
1080p
low	326 FPS	469 FPS
medium	326 FPS	469 FPS
high	326 FPS	469 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	469 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	469 FPS
medium	326 FPS	469 FPS
high	326 FPS	469 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	469 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	469 FPS
medium	326 FPS	469 FPS
high	326 FPS	469 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	413 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Xeon w3-2425

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Xeon w3-2425

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Xeon w3-2425

The Xeon w3-2425 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 18,776 points. Launch price was $529.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-10400F and Xeon w3-2425 share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 4.4 GHz on the Xeon w3-2425 — a 2.3% clock advantage for the Xeon w3-2425 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon w3-2425 uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Xeon w3-2425's 18,776 — a 36.1% lead for the Xeon w3-2425. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 15 MB on the Xeon w3-2425.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Xeon w3-2425
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	6 / 12
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz	4.4 GHz+2%
Base Clock	2.9 GHz	3 GHz+3%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	15 MB+25%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	2 MB (per core)+700%
Process	14 nm	Intel 7 nm-50%
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	13,029	18,776+44%
Cinebench R23 Multi	8,191	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,454	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,783	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon w3-2425 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Xeon w3-2425
Socket	LGA1200	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) / not specified (Xeon w3-2425). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Xeon w3-2425
Integrated GPU	No	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-10400F launched at $160 MSRP, while the Xeon w3-2425 debuted at $529. On MSRP ($160 vs $529), the Core i5-10400F is $369 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 35.5 pts/$ for the Xeon w3-2425 — making the Core i5-10400F the 78.6% better value option.