PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-10400F vs Xeon w5-2445 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-10400F vs Xeon w5-2445: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 175W, a 110W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon w5-2445.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w5-2445 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (8,191 vs 15,500).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 26 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon w5-2445, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Xeon w5-2445 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon w5-2445

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +36.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+118.8% larger total L3 cache (26 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 16.
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
✅300% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌169.2% higher power demand at 175W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon w5-2445 better than Core i5-10400F?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon w5-2445 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-10400F is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon w5-2445 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 36.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon w5-2445 is the stronger fit. You are getting 89.2% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 10 cores and 20 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 118.8% larger total L3 cache (26 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon w5-2445 is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-10400F is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon w5-2445 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $160 MSRP, and it still gives you a 36.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-10400F is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (81.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon w5-2445 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2020), a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, 118.8% larger total L3 cache (26 MB vs 12 MB), more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 20 threads instead of 6/12, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-10400F vs Xeon w5-2445 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Xeon w5-2445

The Xeon w5-2445 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 26.25 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 175 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 32,213 points. Launch price was $839.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon w5-2445 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon w5-2445 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon w5-2445 — a 6.7% clock advantage for the Xeon w5-2445 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon w5-2445 uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Xeon w5-2445's 32,213 — a 84.8% lead for the Xeon w5-2445. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 8,191 vs 15,500 (61.7% advantage for the Xeon w5-2445). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,454 vs 1,822, a 22.5% lead for the Xeon w5-2445 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 5,783 vs 10,719 (59.8% advantage for the Xeon w5-2445). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 26.25 MB on the Xeon w5-2445.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Xeon w5-2445
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	10 / 20+67%
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz	4.6 GHz+7%
Base Clock	2.9 GHz	3.1 GHz+7%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	26.25 MB+119%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+12700%	2 MB (per core)
Process	14 nm	Intel 7 nm-50%
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	13,029	32,213+147%
Cinebench R23 Multi	8,191	15,500+89%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,454	1,822+25%
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,783	10,719+85%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon w5-2445 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon w5-2445 — the Xeon w5-2445 supports 80% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon w5-2445 supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-10400F) vs 4 (Xeon w5-2445). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-10400F) vs 64 (Xeon w5-2445) — the Xeon w5-2445 offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and W790 (Xeon w5-2445).

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Xeon w5-2445
Socket	LGA1200	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	DDR5-4800+80%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	2048 GB+1500%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	64+300%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon w5-2445 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon w5-2445). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming, Xeon w5-2445 targets Professional Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600; Xeon w5-2445 rivals Threadripper 7945WX.