PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,029 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $1,189 MSRP).
✅Delivers 167.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 30.4 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $1,189 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 270W, a 205W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon w5-3425.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w5-3425 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 36,178).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon w5-3425, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads and 112 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Xeon w5-3425 moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Xeon w5-3425

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +93.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+150% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads, plus 112 PCIe lanes vs 16.
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
✅600% more PCIe lanes (112 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 30.4 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($1,189 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
❌315.4% higher power demand at 270W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Xeon w5-3425

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,029 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $1,189 MSRP).
✅Delivers 167.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 30.4 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $1,189 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 270W, a 205W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon w5-3425.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +93.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+150% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads, plus 112 PCIe lanes vs 16.
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
✅600% more PCIe lanes (112 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w5-3425 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 36,178).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon w5-3425, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads and 112 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Xeon w5-3425 moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 30.4 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($1,189 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
❌315.4% higher power demand at 270W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon w5-3425 better than Core i5-10400F?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon w5-3425 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-10400F is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon w5-3425 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 93.1% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon w5-3425 is the better fit. You are getting 177.7% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 150% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon w5-3425 is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-10400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Xeon w5-3425 is 643.1% more expensive on MSRP at $1,189 MSRP versus $160 MSRP, and it gives you a 93.1% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-10400F is also 167.6% better value on MSRP (81.4 vs 30.4 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon w5-3425 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2020), a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, 150% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 12 MB), more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 24 threads instead of 6/12, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-10400F Benchmark Check

Xeon w5-3425 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Xeon w5-3425
1080p
low	192 FPS	172 FPS
medium	152 FPS	155 FPS
high	123 FPS	127 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	107 FPS
1440p
low	153 FPS	143 FPS
medium	119 FPS	123 FPS
high	97 FPS	98 FPS
ultra	79 FPS	83 FPS
4K
low	82 FPS	77 FPS
medium	70 FPS	71 FPS
high	55 FPS	57 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	44 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Xeon w5-3425

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Xeon w5-3425
1080p
low	326 FPS	579 FPS
medium	318 FPS	497 FPS
high	290 FPS	417 FPS
ultra	253 FPS	378 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	490 FPS
medium	292 FPS	433 FPS
high	267 FPS	373 FPS
ultra	234 FPS	322 FPS
4K
low	309 FPS	303 FPS
medium	258 FPS	269 FPS
high	235 FPS	251 FPS
ultra	199 FPS	219 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Xeon w5-3425

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Xeon w5-3425
1080p
low	326 FPS	898 FPS
medium	326 FPS	812 FPS
high	326 FPS	775 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	691 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	781 FPS
medium	326 FPS	703 FPS
high	326 FPS	667 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	595 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	523 FPS
medium	326 FPS	440 FPS
high	289 FPS	399 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	332 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Xeon w5-3425

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Xeon w5-3425
1080p
low	326 FPS	904 FPS
medium	326 FPS	904 FPS
high	326 FPS	884 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	765 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	904 FPS
medium	326 FPS	847 FPS
high	326 FPS	727 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	619 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	683 FPS
medium	326 FPS	604 FPS
high	326 FPS	534 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	437 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Xeon w5-3425

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Xeon w5-3425

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Xeon w5-3425

The Xeon w5-3425 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 36,178 points. Launch price was $1,189.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon w5-3425 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon w5-3425 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon w5-3425 — a 6.7% clock advantage for the Xeon w5-3425 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon w5-3425 uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Xeon w5-3425's 36,178 — a 94.1% lead for the Xeon w5-3425. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 30 MB on the Xeon w5-3425.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Xeon w5-3425
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	12 / 24+100%
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz	4.6 GHz+7%
Base Clock	2.9 GHz	3.2 GHz+10%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	30 MB+150%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	2 MB (per core)+700%
Process	14 nm	Intel 7 nm-50%
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	13,029	36,178+178%
Cinebench R23 Multi	8,191	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,454	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,783	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon w5-3425 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon w5-3425 — the Xeon w5-3425 supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon w5-3425 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-10400F) vs 8 (Xeon w5-3425). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-10400F) vs 112 (Xeon w5-3425) — the Xeon w5-3425 offers 96 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and W790 (Xeon w5-3425).

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Xeon w5-3425
Socket	LGA1200	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	DDR5-4800+25%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	4096 GB+3100%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	112+600%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon w5-3425 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Xeon w5-3425
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-10400F launched at $160 MSRP, while the Xeon w5-3425 debuted at $1189. On MSRP ($160 vs $1189), the Core i5-10400F is $1029 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 30.4 pts/$ for the Xeon w5-3425 — making the Core i5-10400F the 91.2% better value option.