Core i5-10400F vs Xeon w7-3455

Intel

Core i5-10400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2020
Core family
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon w7-3455

24 Cores48 Thrd270 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2023

Core i5-10400F vs Xeon w7-3455 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-10400F vs Xeon w7-3455 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-10400F vs Xeon w7-3455: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

  • +204.7% higher Geekbench multi-core.
  • Costs $2,329 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $2,489 MSRP).
  • Delivers 269.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 22.1 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $2,489 MSRP).
  • Draws 65W instead of 270W, a 205W reduction.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon w7-3455.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w7-3455 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 68 MB).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon w7-3455, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 112 PCIe lanes.
  • Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Xeon w7-3455 moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Xeon w7-3455

2023

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +48.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +462.5% larger total L3 cache (68 MB vs 12 MB).
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 112 PCIe lanes vs 16.
  • Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
  • 600% more PCIe lanes (112 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Lower Geekbench multi-core (1,898 vs 5,783).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 22.1 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($2,489 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
  • 315.4% higher power demand at 270W vs 65W.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon w7-3455 better than Core i5-10400F?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon w7-3455 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-10400F is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-10400F is the stronger fit. You are getting 204.7% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon w7-3455 is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-10400F is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon w7-3455 comes in 1455.6% more expensive on MSRP at $2,489 MSRP versus $160 MSRP, and it still gives you a 48.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core i5-10400F is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 204.7% better Geekbench multi-core. Core i5-10400F is also 269.0% better value on MSRP (81.4 vs 22.1 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon w7-3455 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2020), a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, 462.5% larger total L3 cache (68 MB vs 12 MB), and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-10400F vs Xeon w7-3455 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Intel

Xeon w7-3455

The Xeon w7-3455 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 67.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 54,925 points. Launch price was $2,489.

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon w7-3455 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon w7-3455 has 18 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w7-3455 — a 11% clock advantage for the Xeon w7-3455 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon w7-3455 uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Xeon w7-3455's 54,925 — a 123.3% lead for the Xeon w7-3455. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,454 vs 1,900, a 26.6% lead for the Xeon w7-3455 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 5,783 vs 1,898 (101.2% advantage for the Core i5-10400F). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 67.5 MB on the Xeon w7-3455.

FeatureCore i5-10400FXeon w7-3455
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
24 / 48+300%
Boost Clock
4.3 GHz
4.8 GHz+12%
Base Clock
2.9 GHz+16%
2.5 GHz
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
67.5 MB+463%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)+12700%
2 MB (per core)
Process
14 nm
Intel 7 nm-50%
Architecture
Comet Lake (2020−2025)
Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark
13,029
54,925+322%
Cinebench R23 Multi
8,191
Geekbench 6 Single
1,454
1,900+31%
Geekbench 6 Multi
5,783+205%
1,898
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon w7-3455 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon w7-3455 — the Xeon w7-3455 supports 80% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon w7-3455 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB 3100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-10400F) vs 8 (Xeon w7-3455). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-10400F) vs 112 (Xeon w7-3455) — the Xeon w7-3455 offers 96 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and Intel W790 (Xeon w7-3455).

FeatureCore i5-10400FXeon w7-3455
Socket
LGA1200
LGA4677
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
DDR5-4800+80%
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
4096 GB+3100%
RAM Channels
2
8+300%
ECC Support
No
Yes
PCIe Lanes
16
112+600%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Xeon w7-3455 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon w7-3455 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) vs true (Xeon w7-3455). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600; Xeon w7-3455 rivals Threadripper PRO 7965WX.

FeatureCore i5-10400FXeon w7-3455
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
true
Target Use
Gaming
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-10400F was priced at $160, while the Xeon w7-3455 came in at $2489. On launch pricing ($160 vs $2489), Core i5-10400F was $2329 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 22.1 pts/$ for the Xeon w7-3455 — making the Core i5-10400F the 114.7% better value option.

FeatureCore i5-10400FXeon w7-3455
MSRP
$160-94%
$2489
Performance per Dollar
81.4+268%
22.1
Release Date
2020
2023

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.