
Core i5-10600

Core i7-8700K
Core i5-10600 vs Core i7-8700K Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-10600 vs Core i7-8700K FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-10600 vs Core i7-8700K: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-10600
2020Why buy it
- ✅+0% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $115 less on MSRP ($244 MSRP vs $359 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 47.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 55.6 vs 37.8 PassMark/$ ($244 MSRP vs $359 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-8700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-8700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-8700K
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 630, while Core i5-10600 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,572 vs 13,573).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 37.8 vs 55.6 PassMark/$ ($359 MSRP vs $244 MSRP).
- ❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-10600 better than Core i7-8700K?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-10600 vs Core i7-8700K Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-10600
The Core i5-10600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 13,573 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i7-8700K
The Core i7-8700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 5 October 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-S (2017−2018) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 12288 kB. L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,572 points. Launch price was $359.
Processing Power
Both the Core i5-10600 and Core i7-8700K share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i5-10600 versus 4.7 GHz on the Core i7-8700K — a 2.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-10600 (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core i5-10600 uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-8700K uses Coffee Lake-S (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10600 scores 13,573 against the Core i7-8700K's 13,572 — a 0% lead for the Core i5-10600. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10600 vs 12288 kB on the Core i7-8700K.
| Feature | Core i5-10600 | Core i7-8700K |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+2% | 4.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz | 3.7 GHz+12% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 12288 kB |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Coffee Lake-S (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 13,573 | 13,572 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-10600 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-8700K uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-10600 | Core i7-8700K |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
The Core i7-8700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 630), while the Core i5-10600 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core i5-10600 | Core i7-8700K |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-10600 was priced at $244, while the Core i7-8700K came in at $359. On launch pricing ($244 vs $359), Core i5-10600 was $115 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10600 delivers 55.6 pts/$ vs 37.8 pts/$ for the Core i7-8700K — making the Core i5-10600 the 38.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-10600 | Core i7-8700K |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $244-32% | $359 |
| Performance per Dollar | 55.6+47% | 37.8 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2017 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














