
Core i5-10600

Ryzen 9 5900H
Core i5-10600 vs Ryzen 9 5900H Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-10600 vs Ryzen 9 5900H FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-10600 vs Ryzen 9 5900H: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-10600
2020Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $244 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 5900H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
Ryzen 9 5900H
2021Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,510 vs 13,573).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-10600 better than Ryzen 9 5900H?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-10600 vs Ryzen 9 5900H Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-10600
The Core i5-10600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 13,573 points. Launch price was $149.


Ryzen 9 5900H
The Ryzen 9 5900H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 January 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Cezanne U (Zen 3) (2021−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 13,510 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i5-10600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 9 5900H offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 9 5900H has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i5-10600 versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900H — a 4.3% clock advantage for the Core i5-10600 (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i5-10600 uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 9 5900H uses Cezanne U (Zen 3) (2021−2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10600 scores 13,573 against the Ryzen 9 5900H's 13,510 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i5-10600. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10600 vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900H.
| Feature | Core i5-10600 | Ryzen 9 5900H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+4% | 4.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 16 MB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core)+6300% | 4 MB |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Cezanne U (Zen 3) (2021−2022) |
| PassMark | 13,573 | 13,510 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-10600 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 9 5900H uses FP6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-10600 | Ryzen 9 5900H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | FP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













