Core i5-11320H
VS
Core i7-9700K

Core i5-11320H vs Core i7-9700K

Intel

Core i5-11320H

4 Cores8 Thrd28 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2021
VS
Intel

Core i7-9700K

8 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2018

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Core i5-11320H is positioned at rank #516 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-11320H

#162
Core Ultra 7 256V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $350
100%
#504
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
674%
#505
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
664%
#506
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
610%
#507
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
607%
#508
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
602%
#510
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
581%
#511
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
557%
#512
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
556%
#513
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
541%
#516
Core i5-11320H
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-9700K

#259
Core i3-9100TE
MSRP: $122|Avg: $60
106%
#260
Core i5-12500T
MSRP: $302|Avg: $214
106%
#261
Core i9-13900
MSRP: $549|Avg: $599
105%
#262
Core i7-11700
MSRP: $323|Avg: $274
105%
#262
Core i7-8700K
MSRP: $359|Avg: $160
53%
#263
Core i9-13900T
MSRP: $549|Avg: $570
104%
#264
Processor 300T
MSRP: $82|Avg: $82
103%
#265
Athlon 3000G
MSRP: $49|Avg: $60
103%
#266
Athlon 220GE
MSRP: $65|Avg: $60
103%
#267
Ryzen 9 3900X
MSRP: $499|Avg: $441
102%
#268
Core i5-10500
MSRP: $200|Avg: $178
102%
#269
Celeron G6900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $50
102%
#270
Core i9-10850K
MSRP: $453|Avg: $300
102%
#271
Core i9-13900E
MSRP: $554|Avg: $554
101%
#272
Core i9-9820X
MSRP: $889|Avg: $280
101%
#273
Core i9-9900X
MSRP: $989|Avg: $300
100%
#274
Ryzen 7 1800X
MSRP: $499|Avg: $120
45%
#274
Core i7-9700K
MSRP: $385|Avg: $200
100%
#275
Core i3-10320
MSRP: $154|Avg: $140
99%
#276
Core i5-9600KF
MSRP: $262|Avg: $150
99%
#277
Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE
MSRP: $180|Avg: $180
98%
#278
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
MSRP: $549|Avg: $116
43%
#278
Core i7-14701TE
MSRP: $392|Avg: $390
98%
#279
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
MSRP: $799|Avg: $265
40%
#279
Core i9-11900KF
MSRP: $513|Avg: $349
98%
#280
Athlon Silver 3050GE
MSRP: $75|Avg: $65
97%
#280
Core i7-7820X
MSRP: $599|Avg: $198
40%
#281
Core i7-9700E
MSRP: $259|Avg: $180
97%
#282
Core i7-11700K
MSRP: $399|Avg: $350
97%
#283
Ryzen Threadripper 1920
MSRP: $799|Avg: $200
38%
#283
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
MSRP: $329|Avg: $330
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i7-9700K delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core i5-11320H in both compute-intensive tasks (27.8% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore i5-11320HCore i7-9700K
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($200)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Tiger Lake-H35 (2021) / 10 nm SuperFin)
✨ Modern (Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i5-11320HCore i7-9700K
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($200)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-11320H and Core i7-9700K

Intel

Core i5-11320H

The Core i5-11320H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 June 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H35 (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 10,879 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Core i7-9700K

The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Processing Power

The Core i5-11320H packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i7-9700K offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-9700K has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core i5-11320H versus 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K — a 8.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i5-11320H uses the Tiger Lake-H35 (2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Core i7-9700K uses Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-11320H scores 10,879 against the Core i7-9700K's 14,397 — a 27.8% lead for the Core i7-9700K. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i5-11320H vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K.

FeatureCore i5-11320HCore i7-9700K
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
8 / 8+100%
Boost Clock
4.5 GHz
4.9 GHz+9%
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
3.6 GHz+44%
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
12 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)+400%
256K (per core)
Process
10 nm SuperFin-29%
14 nm
Architecture
Tiger Lake-H35 (2021)
Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)
PassMark
10,879
14,397+32%
Cinebench R23 Multi
5,852
Geekbench 6 Single
1,447
Geekbench 6 Multi
5,633
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-11320H uses the FCBGA1449 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i7-9700K uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Core i7-9700K supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-11320H) vs 16 (Core i7-9700K) — the Core i5-11320H offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM570,QM580,WM590 (Core i5-11320H) and Intel 300 series (Core i7-9700K).

FeatureCore i5-11320HCore i7-9700K
Socket
FCBGA1449
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200
DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
128 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
20+25%
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i7-9700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Core i5-11320H supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-11320H) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K). Both include integrated graphics Iris Xe Graphics (96 EU) (Core i5-11320H) and UHD Graphics 630 (Core i7-9700K) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-11320H targets Productivity, Core i7-9700K targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-11320H rivals Ryzen 5 5600H.

FeatureCore i5-11320HCore i7-9700K
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Iris Xe Graphics (96 EU)
UHD Graphics 630
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
Yes
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Productivity
Desktop