Core i5-11320H vs Xeon E5-4650 v2

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-11320H vs Xeon E5-4650 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-11320H vs Xeon E5-4650 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-11320H

2021

Why buy it

✅Draws 28W instead of 95W, a 67W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics (96 EU), while Xeon E5-4650 v2 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-4650 v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (10,879 vs 10,946).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 25 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4650 v2, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.

Xeon E5-4650 v2

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+212.5% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $1,723 MSRP, while Core i5-11320H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌239.3% higher power demand at 95W vs 28W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-11320H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-4650 v2 better than Core i5-11320H?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-4650 v2 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-11320H is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-4650 v2 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-4650 v2 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 20 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 212.5% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-4650 v2 is the better buy right now. Xeon E5-4650 v2 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $1,723 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (6.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-11320H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2014) and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-11320H vs Xeon E5-4650 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-11320H

The Core i5-11320H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 June 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H35 (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 10,879 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-4650 v2

The Xeon E5-4650 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600, DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 10,946 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-11320H packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-4650 v2 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon E5-4650 v2 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core i5-11320H versus 2.9 GHz on the Xeon E5-4650 v2 — a 43.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-11320H (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i5-11320H is built on the Tiger Lake-H35 (2021) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-11320H scores 10,879 against the Xeon E5-4650 v2's 10,946 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon E5-4650 v2. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i5-11320H vs 25 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Xeon E5-4650 v2.

Feature	Core i5-11320H	Xeon E5-4650 v2
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	10 / 20+150%
Boost Clock	4.5 GHz+55%	2.9 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+4%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	25 MB Intel® Smart Cache+213%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	—
Process	10 nm SuperFin-55%	22 nm
Architecture	Tiger Lake-H35 (2021)	—
PassMark	10,879	10,946
Cinebench R23 Multi	5,852	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,447	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,633	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-11320H uses the FCBGA1449 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-4650 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-11320H	Xeon E5-4650 v2
Socket	FCBGA1449	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-11320H) / not specified (Xeon E5-4650 v2). The Core i5-11320H includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics (96 EU)), while the Xeon E5-4650 v2 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-11320H targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core i5-11320H rivals Ryzen 5 5600H.