Core i5-11320H vs Xeon E5-2643 v4

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-11320H vs Xeon E5-2643 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-11320H vs Xeon E5-2643 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-11320H

2021

Why buy it

✅Draws 28W instead of 135W, a 107W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics (96 EU), while Xeon E5-2643 v4 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (10,879 vs 11,024).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2643 v4, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads.

Xeon E5-2643 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+1.3% higher PassMark.
✅+150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $1,552 MSRP, while Core i5-11320H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌382.1% higher power demand at 135W vs 28W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-11320H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-11320H better than Xeon E5-2643 v4?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2643 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-11320H is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2643 v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-11320H is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-2643 v4 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i5-11320H comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $1,552 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2643 v4 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.3% better PassMark. Xeon E5-2643 v4 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (7.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-11320H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2016) and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-11320H vs Xeon E5-2643 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-11320H

The Core i5-11320H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 June 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H35 (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 10,879 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2643 v4

The Xeon E5-2643 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB. L2 cache: 1.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 11,024 points. Launch price was $1,552.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-11320H packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2643 v4 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon E5-2643 v4 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core i5-11320H versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon E5-2643 v4 — a 19.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-11320H (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i5-11320H uses the Tiger Lake-H35 (2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Xeon E5-2643 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-11320H scores 10,879 against the Xeon E5-2643 v4's 11,024 — a 1.3% lead for the Xeon E5-2643 v4. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i5-11320H vs 20 MB on the Xeon E5-2643 v4.

Feature	Core i5-11320H	Xeon E5-2643 v4
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	6 / 12+50%
Boost Clock	4.5 GHz+22%	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	3.4 GHz+36%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	20 MB+150%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	1.5 MB+20%
Process	10 nm SuperFin-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Tiger Lake-H35 (2021)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	10,879	11,024+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi	5,852	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,447	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,633	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-11320H uses the FCBGA1449 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2643 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-11320H	Xeon E5-2643 v4
Socket	FCBGA1449	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-11320H) / not specified (Xeon E5-2643 v4). The Core i5-11320H includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics (96 EU)), while the Xeon E5-2643 v4 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-11320H targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core i5-11320H rivals Ryzen 5 5600H.