
Core i5-11320H
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 4500U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-11320H
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics (96 EU), while Ryzen 5 4500U needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌86.7% higher power demand at 28W vs 15W.
Ryzen 5 4500U
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 28W, a 13W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-11320H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,692 vs 10,879).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-11320H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-11320H
2021Ryzen 5 4500U
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics (96 EU), while Ryzen 5 4500U needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 28W, a 13W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌86.7% higher power demand at 28W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-11320H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,692 vs 10,879).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-11320H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-11320H better than Ryzen 5 4500U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-11320H | Ryzen 5 4500U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 176 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 148 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 97 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-11320H | Ryzen 5 4500U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 254 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 247 FPS | 186 FPS |
| ultra | 209 FPS | 147 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 215 FPS |
| medium | 244 FPS | 185 FPS |
| high | 219 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 188 FPS | 160 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 139 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 109 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-11320H | Ryzen 5 4500U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 267 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 267 FPS |
| high | 272 FPS | 267 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 267 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 267 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 267 FPS |
| high | 272 FPS | 267 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 263 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 267 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 238 FPS |
| high | 272 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 254 FPS | 159 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-11320H | Ryzen 5 4500U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 267 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 267 FPS |
| high | 272 FPS | 267 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 267 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 267 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 267 FPS |
| high | 272 FPS | 267 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 267 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 267 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 267 FPS |
| high | 272 FPS | 267 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 267 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-11320H and Ryzen 5 4500U

Core i5-11320H
Core i5-11320H
The Core i5-11320H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 June 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H35 (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 10,879 points. Launch price was $149.


Ryzen 5 4500U
Ryzen 5 4500U
The Ryzen 5 4500U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir-U (Zen 2) (2020−2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 10,692 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i5-11320H packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 5 4500U offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the Ryzen 5 4500U has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core i5-11320H versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 4500U — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-11320H (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i5-11320H uses the Tiger Lake-H35 (2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Ryzen 5 4500U uses Renoir-U (Zen 2) (2020−2021) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-11320H scores 10,879 against the Ryzen 5 4500U's 10,692 — a 1.7% lead for the Core i5-11320H. Both processors carry 8 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i5-11320H | Ryzen 5 4500U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 6 / 6+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz+13% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz+9% | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm SuperFin | 7 nm-30% |
| Architecture | Tiger Lake-H35 (2021) | Renoir-U (Zen 2) (2020−2021) |
| PassMark | 10,879+2% | 10,692 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 5,852 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,447 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,633 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-11320H uses the FCBGA1449 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 4500U uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-11320H | Ryzen 5 4500U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1449 | FP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-11320H) / not specified (Ryzen 5 4500U). The Core i5-11320H includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics (96 EU)), while the Ryzen 5 4500U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-11320H targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core i5-11320H rivals Ryzen 5 5600H.
| Feature | Core i5-11320H | Ryzen 5 4500U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Iris Xe Graphics (96 EU) | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Productivity | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











