
Core i5-12400F
Popular choices:

Core i5-14400
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $47 less on MSRP ($174 MSRP vs $221 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-14400.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-14400 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,532 vs 25,329).
Core i5-14400
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌27% HIGHER MSRP$221 MSRPvs$174 MSRP
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Core i5-12400F
2022Core i5-14400
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $47 less on MSRP ($174 MSRP vs $221 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-14400.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-14400 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,532 vs 25,329).
Trade-offs
- ❌27% HIGHER MSRP$221 MSRPvs$174 MSRP
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-14400 better than Core i5-12400F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Core i5-14400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 85 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 47 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Core i5-14400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 548 FPS |
| medium | 397 FPS | 466 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 390 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 354 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 407 FPS | 457 FPS |
| medium | 351 FPS | 402 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 345 FPS |
| ultra | 265 FPS | 299 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 244 FPS |
| high | 229 FPS | 229 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 202 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Core i5-14400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 633 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 610 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 540 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 458 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 633 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 548 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 479 FPS |
| ultra | 434 FPS | 411 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 494 FPS |
| medium | 389 FPS | 412 FPS |
| high | 337 FPS | 370 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 311 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Core i5-14400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 633 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 633 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 633 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 596 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 633 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 633 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 565 FPS |
| ultra | 473 FPS | 493 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 515 FPS |
| medium | 450 FPS | 471 FPS |
| high | 391 FPS | 418 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 363 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400F and Core i5-14400

Core i5-12400F
Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

Core i5-14400
Core i5-14400
The Core i5-14400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 25,329 points. Launch price was $221.
Processing Power
The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i5-14400 offers 10 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-14400 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 4.7 GHz on the Core i5-14400 — a 6.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-14400 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i5-14400 uses Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Core i5-14400's 25,329 — a 25.8% lead for the Core i5-14400. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-14400.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Core i5-14400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 10 / 16+67% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.7 GHz+7% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total) | 20 MB (total)+11% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 19,532 | 25,329+30% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,380 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,700 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 657 | — |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 3.0.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Core i5-14400 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) / not specified (Core i5-14400). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Core i5-14400 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Gaming Performance/Value | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-12400F launched at $174 MSRP, while the Core i5-14400 debuted at $221. On MSRP ($174 vs $221), the Core i5-12400F is $47 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-12400F delivers 112.3 pts/$ vs 114.6 pts/$ for the Core i5-14400 — making the Core i5-14400 the 2.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Core i5-14400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $174-21% | $221 |
| Performance per Dollar | 112.3 | 114.6+2% |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












