PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-12400F

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $165 less on MSRP ($174 MSRP vs $339 MSRP).
✅Delivers 79.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.3 vs 62.5 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $339 MSRP).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-12700T.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (12,380 vs 21,568).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 25 MB).
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-12700T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-12700T

2022

Why buy it

✅+74.2% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅+38.9% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 18 MB).
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Core i5-12400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 62.5 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($339 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.

Core i5-12400F

2022

Core i7-12700T

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $165 less on MSRP ($174 MSRP vs $339 MSRP).
✅Delivers 79.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.3 vs 62.5 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $339 MSRP).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-12700T.

Why buy it

✅+74.2% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅+38.9% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 18 MB).
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Core i5-12400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (12,380 vs 21,568).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 25 MB).
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-12700T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 62.5 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($339 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-12700T better than Core i5-12400F?

It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Core i5-12400F is ahead with a 6.8% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-12700T pulls ahead with 74.2% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. Core i7-12700T also has the bigger cache pool with 38.9% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 18 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-12700T is the better fit. You are getting 74.2% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 12 cores and 20 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 38.9% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 18 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-12700T is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-12400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Core i7-12700T is 94.8% more expensive on MSRP at $339 MSRP versus $174 MSRP, and it gives you 74.2% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. The trade-off is that Core i5-12400F is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 6.8% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-12400F is also 79.5% better value on MSRP (112.3 vs 62.5 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-12700T is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 38.9% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 18 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 20 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-12400F Benchmark Check

Core i7-12700T Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-12400F	Core i7-12700T
1080p
low	183 FPS	177 FPS
medium	168 FPS	165 FPS
high	139 FPS	136 FPS
ultra	119 FPS	116 FPS
1440p
low	153 FPS	148 FPS
medium	132 FPS	128 FPS
high	106 FPS	103 FPS
ultra	89 FPS	87 FPS
4K
low	87 FPS	84 FPS
medium	81 FPS	77 FPS
high	64 FPS	62 FPS
ultra	49 FPS	48 FPS

Open Core i5-12400F Open Core i7-12700T

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-12400F	Core i7-12700T
1080p
low	471 FPS	307 FPS
medium	397 FPS	261 FPS
high	341 FPS	220 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	200 FPS
1440p
low	407 FPS	257 FPS
medium	351 FPS	228 FPS
high	309 FPS	198 FPS
ultra	265 FPS	172 FPS
4K
low	282 FPS	157 FPS
medium	248 FPS	141 FPS
high	229 FPS	133 FPS
ultra	196 FPS	118 FPS

Open Core i5-12400F Open Core i7-12700T

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-12400F	Core i7-12700T
1080p
low	488 FPS	530 FPS
medium	488 FPS	530 FPS
high	488 FPS	530 FPS
ultra	488 FPS	461 FPS
1440p
low	488 FPS	530 FPS
medium	488 FPS	530 FPS
high	485 FPS	481 FPS
ultra	434 FPS	413 FPS
4K
low	442 FPS	496 FPS
medium	389 FPS	414 FPS
high	337 FPS	371 FPS
ultra	274 FPS	312 FPS

Open Core i5-12400F Open Core i7-12700T

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-12400F	Core i7-12700T
1080p
low	488 FPS	530 FPS
medium	488 FPS	530 FPS
high	488 FPS	530 FPS
ultra	488 FPS	530 FPS
1440p
low	488 FPS	530 FPS
medium	488 FPS	530 FPS
high	488 FPS	530 FPS
ultra	473 FPS	488 FPS
4K
low	488 FPS	515 FPS
medium	450 FPS	469 FPS
high	391 FPS	415 FPS
ultra	330 FPS	361 FPS

Open Core i5-12400F Open Core i7-12700T

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400F and Core i7-12700T

Core i5-12400F

The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

Core i7-12700T

The Core i7-12700T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 21,195 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i7-12700T offers 12 cores / 20 threads — the Core i7-12700T has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 4.7 GHz on the Core i7-12700T — a 6.6% clock advantage for the Core i7-12700T (base: 2.5 GHz vs 1.4 GHz). Both are built on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture using a Intel 7 nm process. In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Core i7-12700T's 21,195 — a 8.2% lead for the Core i7-12700T. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 12,380 vs 21,568 (54.1% advantage for the Core i7-12700T). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,700 vs 2,256, a 28.1% lead for the Core i7-12700T that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 657 vs 9,560 (174.3% advantage for the Core i7-12700T). L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 25 MB (total) on the Core i7-12700T.

Feature	Core i5-12400F	Core i7-12700T
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	12 / 20+100%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz	4.7 GHz+7%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+79%	1.4 GHz
L3 Cache	18 MB (total)	25 MB (total)+39%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	1.25 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Alder Lake-S (2022)	Alder Lake-S (2022)
PassMark	19,532	21,195+9%
Cinebench R23 Multi	12,380	21,568+74%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,700	2,256+33%
Geekbench 6 Multi	657	9,560+1355%

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 3.0. Both support up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-12400F) and LGA1700 (Core i7-12700T).

Feature	Core i5-12400F	Core i7-12700T
Socket	LGA1700	LGA1700
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200	DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-12700T). The Core i7-12700T includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Core i5-12400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.

Feature	Core i5-12400F	Core i7-12700T
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	UHD Graphics 770
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Gaming Performance/Value	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-12400F launched at $174 MSRP, while the Core i7-12700T debuted at $339. On MSRP ($174 vs $339), the Core i5-12400F is $165 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-12400F delivers 112.3 pts/$ vs 62.5 pts/$ for the Core i7-12700T — making the Core i5-12400F the 56.9% better value option.