
Core i5-12400F
Popular choices:

Core i7-1365U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- ✅+40.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-1365U.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-1365U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Core i7-1365U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
Core i7-1365U
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,890 vs 19,532).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 18 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Core i5-12400F
2022Core i7-1365U
2023Why buy it
- ✅+40.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-1365U.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-1365U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Core i7-1365U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,890 vs 19,532).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 18 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-1365U better than Core i5-12400F?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Core i7-1365U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 280 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 250 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 182 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 136 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 90 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Core i7-1365U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 397 FPS | 203 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 183 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 162 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 407 FPS | 219 FPS |
| medium | 351 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 265 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 146 FPS |
| high | 229 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 120 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Core i7-1365U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 347 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 347 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 347 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 347 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 347 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 347 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 347 FPS |
| ultra | 434 FPS | 347 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 347 FPS |
| medium | 389 FPS | 347 FPS |
| high | 337 FPS | 347 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 347 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Core i7-1365U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 347 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 347 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 347 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 347 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 347 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 347 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 347 FPS |
| ultra | 473 FPS | 347 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 347 FPS |
| medium | 450 FPS | 347 FPS |
| high | 391 FPS | 347 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 347 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400F and Core i7-1365U

Core i5-12400F
Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

Core i7-1365U
Core i7-1365U
The Core i7-1365U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-U (2023) architecture. It features 10 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 13,890 points. Launch price was $426.
Processing Power
The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i7-1365U offers 10 cores / 12 threads — the Core i7-1365U has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 5.2 GHz on the Core i7-1365U — a 16.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-1365U (base: 2.5 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i7-1365U uses Raptor Lake-U (2023) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Core i7-1365U's 13,890 — a 33.8% lead for the Core i5-12400F. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-1365U.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Core i7-1365U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 10 / 12+67% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 5.2 GHz+18% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz+39% | 1.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total)+50% | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Raptor Lake-U (2023) |
| PassMark | 19,532+41% | 13,890 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,380 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,700 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 657 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-1365U uses FCBGA1744 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Core i7-1365U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FCBGA1744 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) / not specified (Core i7-1365U). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Core i7-1365U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Gaming Performance/Value | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












