PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-12400F

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $216 less on MSRP ($174 MSRP vs $390 MSRP).
✅Delivers 29.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.3 vs 86.7 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $390 MSRP).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-13700E.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700E across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (12,380 vs 24,775).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 30 MB).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-13700E

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 18 MB).
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Core i5-12400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 86.7 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($390 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.

Core i5-12400F

2022

Core i7-13700E

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $216 less on MSRP ($174 MSRP vs $390 MSRP).
✅Delivers 29.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.3 vs 86.7 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $390 MSRP).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-13700E.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 18 MB).
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Core i5-12400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700E across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (12,380 vs 24,775).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 30 MB).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 86.7 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($390 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13700E better than Core i5-12400F?

Yes. Core i7-13700E is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 12.6% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 100.1% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, 73.2% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-13700E is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 12.6% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13700E is the better fit. You are getting 100.1% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 24 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 66.7% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 18 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13700E is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-12400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Core i7-13700E is 124.1% more expensive on MSRP at $390 MSRP versus $174 MSRP, and it gives you a 12.6% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-12400F is also 29.4% better value on MSRP (112.3 vs 86.7 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-13700E is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022), 66.7% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 18 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 24 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-12400F Benchmark Check

Core i7-13700E Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-12400F	Core i7-13700E
1080p
low	183 FPS	255 FPS
medium	168 FPS	239 FPS
high	139 FPS	203 FPS
ultra	119 FPS	173 FPS
1440p
low	153 FPS	219 FPS
medium	132 FPS	186 FPS
high	106 FPS	151 FPS
ultra	89 FPS	133 FPS
4K
low	87 FPS	149 FPS
medium	81 FPS	127 FPS
high	64 FPS	98 FPS
ultra	49 FPS	86 FPS

Open Core i5-12400F Open Core i7-13700E

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-12400F	Core i7-13700E
1080p
low	471 FPS	362 FPS
medium	397 FPS	310 FPS
high	341 FPS	260 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	234 FPS
1440p
low	407 FPS	315 FPS
medium	351 FPS	279 FPS
high	309 FPS	236 FPS
ultra	265 FPS	200 FPS
4K
low	282 FPS	186 FPS
medium	248 FPS	169 FPS
high	229 FPS	160 FPS
ultra	196 FPS	138 FPS

Open Core i5-12400F Open Core i7-13700E

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-12400F	Core i7-13700E
1080p
low	488 FPS	817 FPS
medium	488 FPS	655 FPS
high	488 FPS	572 FPS
ultra	488 FPS	483 FPS
1440p
low	488 FPS	719 FPS
medium	488 FPS	587 FPS
high	485 FPS	506 FPS
ultra	434 FPS	429 FPS
4K
low	442 FPS	512 FPS
medium	389 FPS	430 FPS
high	337 FPS	387 FPS
ultra	274 FPS	328 FPS

Open Core i5-12400F Open Core i7-13700E

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-12400F	Core i7-13700E
1080p
low	488 FPS	846 FPS
medium	488 FPS	846 FPS
high	488 FPS	754 FPS
ultra	488 FPS	682 FPS
1440p
low	488 FPS	810 FPS
medium	488 FPS	724 FPS
high	488 FPS	625 FPS
ultra	473 FPS	552 FPS
4K
low	488 FPS	557 FPS
medium	450 FPS	505 FPS
high	391 FPS	451 FPS
ultra	330 FPS	396 FPS

Open Core i5-12400F Open Core i7-13700E

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400F and Core i7-13700E

Core i5-12400F

The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

Core i7-13700E

The Core i7-13700E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 33,824 points. Launch price was $499.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i7-13700E offers 16 cores / 24 threads — the Core i7-13700E has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 5.1 GHz on the Core i7-13700E — a 14.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700E (base: 2.5 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i7-13700E uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Core i7-13700E's 33,824 — a 53.6% lead for the Core i7-13700E. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 12,380 vs 24,775 (66.7% advantage for the Core i7-13700E). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,700 vs 2,118, a 21.9% lead for the Core i7-13700E that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 657 vs 14,711 (182.9% advantage for the Core i7-13700E). L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700E.

Feature	Core i5-12400F	Core i7-13700E
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	16 / 24+167%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz	5.1 GHz+16%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+32%	1.9 GHz
L3 Cache	18 MB (total)	30 MB (total)+67%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+60%
Process	Intel 7 nm-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Alder Lake-S (2022)	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
PassMark	19,532	33,824+73%
Cinebench R23 Multi	12,380	24,775+100%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,700	2,118+25%
Geekbench 6 Multi	657	14,711+2139%

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 3.0. Both support up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-12400F) and H610E,Q670E,R680E,W680 (Core i7-13700E).

Feature	Core i5-12400F	Core i7-13700E
Socket	LGA1700	LGA1700
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200	DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Both support VT-x, VT-d, EPT virtualization. The Core i7-13700E includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Core i5-12400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value, Core i7-13700E targets Embedded Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600; Core i7-13700E rivals Ryzen 7 7700.

Feature	Core i5-12400F	Core i7-13700E
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	UHD Graphics 770
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Gaming Performance/Value	Embedded Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-12400F launched at $174 MSRP, while the Core i7-13700E debuted at $390. On MSRP ($174 vs $390), the Core i5-12400F is $216 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-12400F delivers 112.3 pts/$ vs 86.7 pts/$ for the Core i7-13700E — making the Core i5-12400F the 25.7% better value option.