
Core i5-12400F
Popular choices:

Core i7-13850HX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-13850HX.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13850HX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,532 vs 36,409).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Core i7-13850HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.
Core i7-13850HX
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics, while Core i5-12400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Core i5-12400F
2022Core i7-13850HX
2023Why buy it
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-13850HX.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics, while Core i5-12400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13850HX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,532 vs 36,409).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Core i7-13850HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.
Trade-offs
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-13850HX better than Core i5-12400F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Core i7-13850HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 291 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 284 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 229 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 192 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 233 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 203 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 161 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 95 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Core i7-13850HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 348 FPS |
| medium | 397 FPS | 298 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 251 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 227 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 407 FPS | 303 FPS |
| medium | 351 FPS | 270 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 228 FPS |
| ultra | 265 FPS | 195 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 163 FPS |
| high | 229 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 136 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Core i7-13850HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 647 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 530 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 467 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 405 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 590 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 491 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 427 FPS |
| ultra | 434 FPS | 370 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 433 FPS |
| medium | 389 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 337 FPS | 338 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 289 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Core i7-13850HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 910 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 851 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 735 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 660 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 799 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 712 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 615 FPS |
| ultra | 473 FPS | 542 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 548 FPS |
| medium | 450 FPS | 497 FPS |
| high | 391 FPS | 444 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 388 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400F and Core i7-13850HX

Core i5-12400F
Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

Core i7-13850HX
Core i7-13850HX
The Core i7-13850HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture. It features 20 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 36,409 points. Launch price was $428.
Processing Power
The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i7-13850HX offers 20 cores / 28 threads — the Core i7-13850HX has 14 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 5.3 GHz on the Core i7-13850HX — a 18.6% clock advantage for the Core i7-13850HX (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i7-13850HX uses Raptor Lake-HX (2023) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Core i7-13850HX's 36,409 — a 60.3% lead for the Core i7-13850HX. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13850HX.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Core i7-13850HX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 20 / 28+233% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 5.3 GHz+20% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz+19% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total) | 30 MB (total)+67% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+60% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Raptor Lake-HX (2023) |
| PassMark | 19,532 | 36,409+86% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,380 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,700 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 657 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-13850HX uses FCBGA1964 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-12400F versus 5600 on the Core i7-13850HX — the Core i7-13850HX supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-13850HX supports up to 192 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-12400F) and Raptor Lake-HX (Core i7-13850HX).
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Core i7-13850HX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FCBGA1964 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | 5600+111900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+69904967% | 192 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-13850HX). The Core i7-13850HX includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics), while the Core i5-12400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600; Core i7-13850HX rivals Ryzen 7 8845HS.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Core i7-13850HX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel UHD Graphics |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Gaming Performance/Value | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












