
Core i5-12400F
Popular choices:

Core i7-9750H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +21.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of BGA1440 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-9750H.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Core i7-9750H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Core i7-9750H
2019Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,611 vs 19,532).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 18 MB).
- ❌Older platform position on BGA1440 with DDR4, while Core i5-12400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Core i5-12400F
2022Core i7-9750H
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +21.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of BGA1440 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-9750H.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Core i7-9750H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,611 vs 19,532).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 18 MB).
- ❌Older platform position on BGA1440 with DDR4, while Core i5-12400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-12400F better than Core i7-9750H?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Core i7-9750H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 46 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Core i7-9750H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 265 FPS |
| medium | 397 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 265 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 265 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 407 FPS | 265 FPS |
| medium | 351 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 265 FPS |
| ultra | 265 FPS | 241 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 265 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 229 FPS | 236 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 197 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Core i7-9750H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 265 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 265 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 265 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 265 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 265 FPS |
| ultra | 434 FPS | 265 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 265 FPS |
| medium | 389 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 337 FPS | 265 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 239 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Core i7-9750H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 265 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 265 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 265 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 265 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 265 FPS |
| ultra | 473 FPS | 265 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 265 FPS |
| medium | 450 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 391 FPS | 265 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 265 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400F and Core i7-9750H

Core i5-12400F
Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

Core i7-9750H
Core i7-9750H
The Core i7-9750H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-HR (2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 10,611 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Core i5-12400F and Core i7-9750H share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 4.5 GHz on the Core i7-9750H — a 2.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-9750H (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i7-9750H uses Coffee Lake-HR (2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Core i7-9750H's 10,611 — a 59.2% lead for the Core i5-12400F. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9750H.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Core i7-9750H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.5 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 2.6 GHz+4% |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total)+50% | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+400% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Coffee Lake-HR (2019) |
| PassMark | 19,532+84% | 10,611 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,380 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,700 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 657 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-9750H uses BGA1440 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Core i7-9750H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | BGA1440 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) / not specified (Core i7-9750H). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Core i7-9750H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Gaming Performance/Value | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












