
Core i5-12400F

Core i9-12900H
Core i5-12400F vs Core i9-12900H Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-12400F vs Core i9-12900H FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-12400F vs Core i9-12900H: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- β Costs $443 less on MSRP ($174 MSRP vs $617 MSRP).
- β Delivers 155.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.3 vs 43.9 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $617 MSRP).
- β Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i9-12900H.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-12900H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower Cinebench R23 multi-core (12,380 vs 16,500).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 24 MB).
- β44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Core i9-12900H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i9-12900H
2022Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +14.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +33.3% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 18 MB).
- β Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics 96EU, while Core i5-12400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 43.9 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($617 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
- βNo boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-12900H better than Core i5-12400F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-12400F vs Core i9-12900H Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

Core i9-12900H
The Core i9-12900H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-H (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 27,079 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i9-12900H offers 14 cores / 20 threads β the Core i9-12900H has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 5 GHz on the Core i9-12900H β a 12.8% clock advantage for the Core i9-12900H (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i9-12900H uses Alder Lake-H (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Core i9-12900H's 27,079 β a 32.4% lead for the Core i9-12900H. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 12,380 vs 16,500 (28.5% advantage for the Core i9-12900H). Geekbench 6 single-core β the metric most relevant to gaming β records 1,700 vs 2,400, a 34.1% lead for the Core i9-12900H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 657 vs 12,900 (180.6% advantage for the Core i9-12900H). L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 24 MB (total) on the Core i9-12900H.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Core i9-12900H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 14 / 20+133% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 5 GHz+14% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total) | 24 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Alder Lake-H (2022) |
| PassMark | 19,532 | 27,079+39% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,380 | 16,500+33% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,700 | 2,400+41% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 657 | 12,900+1863% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i9-12900H uses FCBGA1744 (PCIe 5.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Core i5-12400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB β 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-12400F) and Intel 600 Series (Mobile) (Core i9-12900H).
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Core i9-12900H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FCBGA1744 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+100% | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) vs Yes (Core i9-12900H). The Core i9-12900H includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics 96EU), while the Core i5-12400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value, Core i9-12900H targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Core i9-12900H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | β | Iris Xe Graphics 96EU |
| Unlocked | β | Yes |
| AVX-512 | β | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | Yes |
| Target Use | Gaming Performance/Value | Mobile |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-12400F was priced at $174, while the Core i9-12900H came in at $617. On launch pricing ($174 vs $617), Core i5-12400F was $443 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-12400F delivers 112.3 pts/$ vs 43.9 pts/$ for the Core i9-12900H β making the Core i5-12400F the 87.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Core i9-12900H |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $174-72% | $617 |
| Performance per Dollar | 112.3+156% | 43.9 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2022 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














